RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

timerring/bilive

Default branch main · commit 19c16950 · scanned 5/28/2026, 2:23:05 PM

GitHub: 3,227 stars · 256 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface timerring/bilive, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Move the project's core value proposition to the top of the README

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The README starts with a logo, then a slogan, then '1. Introduction' which contains a warning before the detailed description.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Insert the following text as the very first content in the README, before any logos or slogans:
`timerring/bilive is an extremely fast, automated Bilibili live stream recording and processing tool. It handles automatic slicing, danmaku/subtitle rendering, MLLM-powered title/cover generation, and direct uploading to Bilibili, even on low-configuration machines.`
  • mediumtopics#2
    Expand repository topics to include automation and AI/ML aspects

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ass, bili, bilibili, bilive, danmaku, live-recording, stream, xml
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ass, bili, bilibili, bilive, danmaku, live-recording, stream, xml, automation, video-processing, machine-learning, ai, mllm, bilibili-automation, live-stream-recorder
  • lowreadme#3
    Add a 'Why Bilive?' or 'Comparison' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section titled 'Why Bilive?' or 'What makes Bilive unique?' that highlights its key differentiators such as:
-   **Bilibili-specific full automation pipeline:** From recording to processing (slicing, rendering danmaku/subtitles, MLLM-powered titles/covers) to direct upload.
-   **Speed:** 'Known as the fastest stable Bilibili recorder.'
-   **MLLM Integration:** For intelligent content generation (titles, covers).
-   **Low-resource compatibility:** Works on x64 and arm64 low-spec machines without GPU.
-   **Multi-room recording and automatic cleanup.**

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface timerring/bilive
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Restream.io
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Restream.io · recommended 2×
  2. StreamYard · recommended 1×
  3. OBS Studio · recommended 1×
  4. Advanced Scene Switcher · recommended 1×
  5. Automatic Upload · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I automatically record live streams, generate subtitles, and embed chat comments?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Restream.io
    2. StreamYard

    AI recommended 2 alternatives but never named timerring/bilive. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a tool to automatically segment and upload recorded live streams, even on low-spec hardware.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OBS Studio
    2. Advanced Scene Switcher
    3. Automatic Upload
    4. Streamlink
    5. FFmpeg
    6. rclone
    7. curl
    8. You-Get
    9. yt-dlp
    10. youtube-dl
    11. Restream.io
    12. VLC Media Player

    AI recommended 12 alternatives but never named timerring/bilive. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of timerring/bilive?
    pass
    AI named timerring/bilive explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts timerring/bilive in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named timerring/bilive explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo timerring/bilive solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named timerring/bilive explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of timerring/bilive. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/timerring/bilive.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/timerring/bilive)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/timerring/bilive"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/timerring/bilive.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

timerring/bilive — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite