RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

timoschick/pet

Default branch master · commit 21d32de9 · scanned 5/16/2026, 12:08:11 AM

GitHub: 1,626 stars · 281 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
33 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface timoschick/pet, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README H1 to clarify NLP domain

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Pattern-Exploiting Training (PET)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Pattern-Exploiting Training (PET): A Few-Shot NLP Method for Text Classification and NLI
  • hightopics#2
    Add specific topics for few-shot learning and low-resource NLP

    Why:

    CURRENT
    machine-learning, nlp, python
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    machine-learning, nlp, python, few-shot-learning, low-resource-nlp, text-classification, natural-language-inference, cloze-questions, semi-supervised-learning
  • mediumreadme#3
    Add a comparison section or sentence to differentiate from common NLP tools

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## How PET Compares to Other Few-Shot NLP Approaches
    
    Unlike general-purpose libraries like Hugging Face Transformers or direct fine-tuning of models like BERT, PET offers a unique semi-supervised training procedure that reformulates input examples as cloze-style phrases. This allows it to achieve significant performance gains in low-resource settings, often outperforming supervised training and even large models like GPT-3, by effectively leveraging unlabeled data and the knowledge embedded in pre-trained language models through a pattern-exploiting mechanism. While SetFit also targets few-shot text classification, PET's cloze-question approach provides an alternative paradigm for leveraging pre-trained knowledge.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface timoschick/pet
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
SetFit
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. SetFit · recommended 1×
  2. Hugging Face Transformers · recommended 1×
  3. BERT · recommended 1×
  4. RoBERTa · recommended 1×
  5. DistilBERT · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to perform text classification with very limited labeled data?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. SetFit
    2. Hugging Face Transformers
    3. BERT
    4. RoBERTa
    5. DistilBERT
    6. XLM-RoBERTa
    7. Argilla
    8. LightTag
    9. NLPAug
    10. Easy Data Augmentation (EDA)
    11. GPT-3.5
    12. GPT-4
    13. OpenAI API
    14. Llama 2
    15. ULMFiT
    16. fast.ai library

    AI recommended 16 alternatives but never named timoschick/pet. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Efficient NLP techniques for text inference without extensive training data or large models?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. spaCy
    2. Flair
    3. Sentence-BERT (SBERT)
    4. FastText
    5. Gensim
    6. Scikit-learn

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named timoschick/pet. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of timoschick/pet?
    pass
    AI named timoschick/pet explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts timoschick/pet in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named timoschick/pet explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo timoschick/pet solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name timoschick/pet — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of timoschick/pet. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/timoschick/pet.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/timoschick/pet)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/timoschick/pet"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/timoschick/pet.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

timoschick/pet — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite