RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

timothybrooks/instruct-pix2pix

Default branch main · commit 0dffd1ee · scanned 6/18/2026, 2:08:33 PM

GitHub: 6,878 stars · 583 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
17 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface timothybrooks/instruct-pix2pix, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Add a concise 'About' description for the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    PyTorch implementation of InstructPix2Pix, an instruction-based image editing model that allows users to modify existing images using natural language instructions.
  • mediumreadme#2
    Clarify the existing license in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    This project is released under [insert specific license name(s) here, e.g., a custom research license or a combination of licenses]. Please refer to the LICENSE file for full details.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface timothybrooks/instruct-pix2pix
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Midjourney
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Midjourney · recommended 2×
  2. Adobe Firefly · recommended 2×
  3. OpenAI DALL-E 3 · recommended 1×
  4. Stability AI Stable Diffusion · recommended 1×
  5. Google Cloud Vertex AI · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I programmatically modify images using natural language instructions?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenAI DALL-E 3
    2. Midjourney
    3. Stability AI Stable Diffusion
    4. Adobe Firefly
    5. Google Cloud Vertex AI
    6. RunwayML

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named timothybrooks/instruct-pix2pix. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools allow AI-driven image transformations based on descriptive text prompts?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Midjourney
    2. Stable Diffusion
    3. DreamStudio
    4. Automatic1111 web UI
    5. Civitai
    6. DALL-E 3
    7. ChatGPT Plus
    8. Microsoft Copilot Pro
    9. Adobe Firefly

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named timothybrooks/instruct-pix2pix. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of timothybrooks/instruct-pix2pix?
    pass
    AI did not name timothybrooks/instruct-pix2pix — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts timothybrooks/instruct-pix2pix in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named timothybrooks/instruct-pix2pix explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo timothybrooks/instruct-pix2pix solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name timothybrooks/instruct-pix2pix — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of timothybrooks/instruct-pix2pix. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/timothybrooks/instruct-pix2pix.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/timothybrooks/instruct-pix2pix)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/timothybrooks/instruct-pix2pix"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/timothybrooks/instruct-pix2pix.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

timothybrooks/instruct-pix2pix — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite