RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

tlysanhuo/aminer-rec

Default branch main · commit 2bcf5dcb · scanned 6/17/2026, 5:48:06 PM

GitHub: 483 stars · 0 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface tlysanhuo/aminer-rec, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README H1 and opening paragraph to clarify its role as a user-facing skill

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # aminer-rec

Public repository for the `aminer-rec5` OpenClaw / Feishu paper recommendation skill...
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # aminer-rec: Personalized Paper Recommendation for OpenClaw / Feishu

This repository provides `aminer-rec5`, a powerful OpenClaw / Feishu skill for personalized paper recommendations, designed to help users find relevant academic papers using natural language descriptions of their work.
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (none)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/tlysanhuo/aminer-rec

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface tlysanhuo/aminer-rec
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Elicit
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Elicit · recommended 2×
  2. Semantic Scholar · recommended 2×
  3. Connected Papers · recommended 2×
  4. ResearchRabbit · recommended 2×
  5. Google Scholar · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to find relevant academic papers using natural language descriptions of my work?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Elicit
    2. Semantic Scholar
    3. Connected Papers
    4. ResearchRabbit
    5. Google Scholar
    6. Scopus / Web of Science

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named tlysanhuo/aminer-rec. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are good tools for AI-driven research paper summarization and personalized suggestions?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Elicit
    2. Semantic Scholar
    3. ResearchRabbit
    4. Scite.ai
    5. Connected Papers
    6. ChatGPT / GPT-4
    7. Humata AI

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named tlysanhuo/aminer-rec. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of tlysanhuo/aminer-rec?
    pass
    AI named tlysanhuo/aminer-rec explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts tlysanhuo/aminer-rec in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named tlysanhuo/aminer-rec explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo tlysanhuo/aminer-rec solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name tlysanhuo/aminer-rec — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of tlysanhuo/aminer-rec. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/tlysanhuo/aminer-rec.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/tlysanhuo/aminer-rec)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/tlysanhuo/aminer-rec"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/tlysanhuo/aminer-rec.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

tlysanhuo/aminer-rec — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite