RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

tomasz-tomczyk/crit

Default branch main · commit 87166d06 · scanned 6/18/2026, 4:41:22 PM

GitHub: 503 stars · 41 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface tomasz-tomczyk/crit, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README's first sentence to clarify AI agent feedback

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Review and comment on plans, code diffs, frontend elements and send feedback directly to your agent.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Crit is a CLI tool that provides a dedicated, local feedback loop for AI agents, enabling developers to review and comment on agent-generated plans, code diffs, and even live web UIs directly.
  • mediumabout#2
    Expand the 'About' description for clarity on AI agent purpose

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Your feedback loop with the agent
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Crit provides a dedicated, local feedback loop for AI agents, enabling developers to review and comment on agent-generated plans, code, and UIs directly, all from your command line.
  • mediumtopics#3
    Add specific topics for AI agent feedback

    Why:

    CURRENT
    agentic-coding, ai-agents, ai-tools, cli, code-review, developer-tools, llm, markdown
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    agentic-coding, ai-agents, ai-tools, cli, code-review, developer-tools, llm, markdown, ai-feedback, agent-feedback, agent-development

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface tomasz-tomczyk/crit
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
GitHub Copilot Chat
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. GitHub Copilot Chat · recommended 1×
  2. GitLab Duo Chat · recommended 1×
  3. Azure DevOps Copilot · recommended 1×
  4. GitHub Pull Requests · recommended 1×
  5. GitLab Merge Requests · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to efficiently review and provide feedback on AI agent generated code and plans?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Copilot Chat
    2. GitLab Duo Chat
    3. Azure DevOps Copilot
    4. GitHub Pull Requests
    5. GitLab Merge Requests
    6. Bitbucket Pull Requests
    7. DeepSource
    8. SonarQube
    9. CodeClimate
    10. Jupyter Notebooks
    11. VS Code Interactive Windows
    12. Figma
    13. Miro
    14. Lucidchart
    15. ChatGPT
    16. Claude
    17. Gemini

    AI recommended 17 alternatives but never named tomasz-tomczyk/crit. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a local tool to review code diffs, markdown, and live web UIs for agent feedback.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. VS Code (microsoft/vscode)
    2. Live Server (ritwickdey/vscode-live-server)
    3. Browser Preview (auchenberg/vscode-browser-preview)
    4. Debugger for Chrome (microsoft/vscode-chrome-debug)
    5. Debugger for Firefox (firefox-devtools/vscode-firefox-debug)
    6. Todo Tree (Gruntfuggly/todo-tree)
    7. WebStorm
    8. IntelliJ IDEA Ultimate
    9. Sublime Text
    10. Sublime Merge
    11. Diffy (sindresorhus/diffy-sublime)
    12. Markdown Preview (revolunet/sublimetext-markdown-preview)
    13. LiveReload (dzhibas/sublimetext-livereload)
    14. Typora
    15. GitKraken Client

    AI recommended 15 alternatives but never named tomasz-tomczyk/crit. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of tomasz-tomczyk/crit?
    pass
    AI named tomasz-tomczyk/crit explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts tomasz-tomczyk/crit in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named tomasz-tomczyk/crit explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo tomasz-tomczyk/crit solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named tomasz-tomczyk/crit explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of tomasz-tomczyk/crit. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/tomasz-tomczyk/crit.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/tomasz-tomczyk/crit)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/tomasz-tomczyk/crit"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/tomasz-tomczyk/crit.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

tomasz-tomczyk/crit — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite