RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

toonight/get-shit-done-for-antigravity

Default branch main · commit 3cb5243b · scanned 6/2/2026, 5:18:04 PM

GitHub: 868 stars · 137 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
23 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface toonight/get-shit-done-for-antigravity, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Add a concise description to the repository's About section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A context engineering layer for AI code generation that ensures reliable, consistent, and production-ready output for solo developers and small teams.
  • highreadme#2
    Reposition the README's opening statement to clearly define the tool's category

    Why:

    CURRENT
    **Stop vibecoding. Start shipping.Describe your idea → GSD extracts everything the AI needs → Watch it build correctly.*
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    **GSD is a context engineering layer for AI code generation.** Stop vibecoding. Start shipping. Describe your idea → GSD extracts everything the AI needs → Watch it build correctly.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface toonight/get-shit-done-for-antigravity
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Jest
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Jest · recommended 1×
  2. Pytest · recommended 1×
  3. JUnit · recommended 1×
  4. NUnit · recommended 1×
  5. Go testing package · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to ensure AI-generated code is reliable, consistent, and production-ready?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Jest
    2. Pytest
    3. JUnit
    4. NUnit
    5. Go testing package
    6. SonarQube
    7. ESLint
    8. Pylint
    9. Flake8
    10. Checkstyle
    11. PMD
    12. RuboCop
    13. Cypress
    14. Selenium
    15. Playwright
    16. Postman
    17. Newman
    18. GitHub Pull Requests
    19. GitLab Merge Requests
    20. Bitbucket Pull Requests
    21. GitHub Actions
    22. GitLab CI/CD
    23. Jenkins
    24. CircleCI
    25. Azure DevOps Pipelines
    26. Hypothesis
    27. QuickCheck
    28. jqwik
    29. FsCheck
    30. AFL++
    31. libFuzzer
    32. Peach Fuzzer

    AI recommended 32 alternatives but never named toonight/get-shit-done-for-antigravity. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a systematic approach to make AI code generation predictable and robust.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenAI API
    2. GitHub Copilot
    3. Hugging Face Transformers (huggingface/transformers)
    4. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    5. DSPy (stanfordnlp/dspy)
    6. Semantic Kernel (microsoft/semantic-kernel)

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named toonight/get-shit-done-for-antigravity. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of toonight/get-shit-done-for-antigravity?
    pass
    AI did not name toonight/get-shit-done-for-antigravity — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts toonight/get-shit-done-for-antigravity in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named toonight/get-shit-done-for-antigravity explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo toonight/get-shit-done-for-antigravity solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named toonight/get-shit-done-for-antigravity explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of toonight/get-shit-done-for-antigravity. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/toonight/get-shit-done-for-antigravity.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/toonight/get-shit-done-for-antigravity)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/toonight/get-shit-done-for-antigravity"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/toonight/get-shit-done-for-antigravity.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

toonight/get-shit-done-for-antigravity — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite