RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

transitive-bullshit/bing-chat

Default branch main · commit d2553b5b · scanned 5/24/2026, 4:11:46 PM

GitHub: 1,208 stars · 118 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface transitive-bullshit/bing-chat, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README intro to highlight unique value

    Why:

    CURRENT
    > Node.js client for the unofficial Bing Chat API. It's like ChatGPT on steroids 🔥
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    > Node.js client for the unofficial Bing Chat API, enabling unique programmatic access to Bing's distinct AI-powered search and conversational features. It's like ChatGPT on steroids 🔥.
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add homepage URL to repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/transitive-bullshit/bing-chat
  • mediumtopics#3
    Refine topics to emphasize specific nature

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ai, bing, chatbot, chatgpt, search
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai, bing, chatbot, chatgpt, search, api-client, reverse-engineered, nodejs

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface transitive-bullshit/bing-chat
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
openai/openai-node
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. openai/openai-node · recommended 2×
  2. anthropics/anthropic-sdk-typescript · recommended 1×
  3. googleapis/google-cloud-node · recommended 1×
  4. Azure/azure-sdk-for-js · recommended 1×
  5. Hugging Face Inference API · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I programmatically access a powerful conversational AI service using Node.js?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenAI API (openai/openai-node)
    2. Anthropic Claude API (anthropics/anthropic-sdk-typescript)
    3. Google Cloud Vertex AI (googleapis/google-cloud-node)
    4. Azure OpenAI Service (Azure/azure-sdk-for-js)
    5. Hugging Face Inference API
    6. Cohere API (cohere-ai/cohere-node)

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named transitive-bullshit/bing-chat. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What Node.js clients exist for interacting with advanced AI-powered search capabilities?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenAI Node.js Library (openai/openai-node)
    2. Pinecone Node.js Client (pinecone-io/pinecone-ts-client)
    3. Weaviate Node.js Client (weaviate/weaviate-ts-client)
    4. Elasticsearch Node.js Client (elastic/elasticsearch-js)
    5. Qdrant Node.js Client (qdrant/qdrant-js)
    6. Milvus Node.js SDK (milvus-io/milvus-sdk-node)

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named transitive-bullshit/bing-chat. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of transitive-bullshit/bing-chat?
    pass
    AI did not name transitive-bullshit/bing-chat — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts transitive-bullshit/bing-chat in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named transitive-bullshit/bing-chat explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo transitive-bullshit/bing-chat solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named transitive-bullshit/bing-chat explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of transitive-bullshit/bing-chat. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/transitive-bullshit/bing-chat.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/transitive-bullshit/bing-chat)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/transitive-bullshit/bing-chat"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/transitive-bullshit/bing-chat.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

transitive-bullshit/bing-chat — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite