RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

u7079256/paperjury

Default branch main · commit fdb1d34f · scanned 7/1/2026, 2:31:50 PM

GitHub: 522 stars · 36 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface u7079256/paperjury, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Add a concise English summary to the top of README.md

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The README.md currently starts with Chinese H1/H2 and a link to README.en.md further down.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add the following text immediately after the `<h1>PaperJury</h1>` line in `README.md`:
```
<p align="center">
  <b>Pre-submission AI review stress-test for LaTeX research papers.</b>
  <br>
  <b>A Claude Code skill for structured, 'jury-like' review, verdict, revision, and verification.</b>
</p>
```
  • mediumtopics#2
    Expand topics to include more specific AI peer review terms

    Why:

    CURRENT
    academic-writing, ai-agents, claude-code, latex, llm-agents, paper-review, peer-review, research-tool
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    academic-writing, ai-agents, claude-code, latex, llm-agents, paper-review, peer-review, research-tool, ai-peer-review, latex-analysis, research-paper-review, academic-ai-assistant
  • lowabout#3
    Refine the repository description for clarity and specificity

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Pre-submission AI review stress-test for research papers. A Claude Code skill: review, verdict, revise, verify.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Pre-submission AI review stress-test for LaTeX research papers, implementing a structured, 'jury-like' process. A Claude Code skill for review, verdict, revision, and verification.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface u7079256/paperjury
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Trinka AI
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Trinka AI · recommended 2×
  2. Elicit · recommended 1×
  3. ChatGPT · recommended 1×
  4. QuillBot · recommended 1×
  5. Paperpal · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I get AI feedback on my research paper before peer review?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Elicit
    2. ChatGPT
    3. QuillBot
    4. Trinka AI
    5. Paperpal

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named u7079256/paperjury. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What AI tools help identify flaws in LaTeX academic papers before submission?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Grammarly
    2. Overleaf's Built-in Linter/Spell Checker
    3. LanguageTool
    4. Vale
    5. ProWritingAid
    6. Trinka AI
    7. Writefull

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named u7079256/paperjury. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of u7079256/paperjury?
    pass
    AI named u7079256/paperjury explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts u7079256/paperjury in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named u7079256/paperjury explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo u7079256/paperjury solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named u7079256/paperjury explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of u7079256/paperjury. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/u7079256/paperjury.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/u7079256/paperjury)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/u7079256/paperjury"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/u7079256/paperjury.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

u7079256/paperjury — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite