RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

val1813/kwcode

Default branch master · commit 2162a958 · scanned 6/1/2026, 9:03:08 AM

GitHub: 641 stars · 93 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
30 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface val1813/kwcode, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README to explicitly state its category and differentiate from misinterpretations

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add the following sentence immediately after the main tagline in your README: 'KWCode is a dedicated local AI coding agent for developers, *not* a keyword extraction tool or a generic script collection. It focuses on enhancing local open-source models for coding tasks.'
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-coding-agent, local-llm, code-generation, developer-tools, cli, react-agent, python, windows-compatible, data-privacy
  • highlicense#3
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a LICENSE file (e.g., MIT, Apache-2.0, GPL-3.0) to the root of your repository. This clarifies usage rights for users and AI.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface val1813/kwcode
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Cursor
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Cursor · recommended 2×
  2. continue-team/continue · recommended 1×
  3. ollama/ollama · recommended 1×
  4. LM Studio · recommended 1×
  5. mudler/LocalAI · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a local AI coding agent for open-source models that prioritizes data privacy.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Continue (continue-team/continue)
    2. Ollama (ollama/ollama)
    3. LM Studio
    4. Cursor
    5. LocalAI (mudler/LocalAI)

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named val1813/kwcode. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Which AI coding assistants offer self-improvement and automatic task retry for development?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Cursor
    2. GitHub Copilot
    3. Smol-Developer (smol-ai/smol-developer)
    4. Aider (paul-gauthier/aider)
    5. Code Llama

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named val1813/kwcode. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of val1813/kwcode?
    pass
    AI named val1813/kwcode explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts val1813/kwcode in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named val1813/kwcode explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo val1813/kwcode solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named val1813/kwcode explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of val1813/kwcode. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/val1813/kwcode.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/val1813/kwcode)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/val1813/kwcode"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/val1813/kwcode.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

val1813/kwcode — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite