RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

vanzan01/cursor-memory-bank

Default branch main · commit 7d879d8f · scanned 5/27/2026, 6:57:27 PM

GitHub: 3,034 stars · 440 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
30 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface vanzan01/cursor-memory-bank, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening sentence to clearly state its category

    Why:

    CURRENT
    A token-optimized, hierarchical task management system that uses Cursor 2.0 commands for efficient development workflows.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    This modular, documentation-driven framework leverages Cursor custom modes (VAN, PLAN, CREATIVE, IMPLEMENT) to provide persistent memory and guide AI through a structured development workflow with visual process maps.
  • mediumlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a `LICENSE` file in the repository root, for example, using the MIT License.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface vanzan01/cursor-memory-bank
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Jira
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Jira · recommended 2×
  2. Lucidchart · recommended 2×
  3. draw.io · recommended 2×
  4. LangChain · recommended 1×
  5. LlamaIndex · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Frameworks for guiding AI through a structured development process with persistent context?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. Haystack
    4. Microsoft Semantic Kernel
    5. AutoGPT
    6. OpenAI Assistants API

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named vanzan01/cursor-memory-bank. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Tools for hierarchical task management and visual process mapping in AI development?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Jira
    2. Advanced Roadmaps
    3. Lucidchart
    4. Azure DevOps
    5. Azure Boards
    6. Azure Pipelines
    7. Azure Data Factory
    8. draw.io
    9. ClickUp
    10. Monday.com
    11. Trello
    12. Hello Epics
    13. Burndown for Trello
    14. Lucidchart
    15. Miro
    16. Mural
    17. Asana
    18. Wrike
    19. Confluence
    20. Gliffy
    21. draw.io
    22. Jira

    AI recommended 22 alternatives but never named vanzan01/cursor-memory-bank. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of vanzan01/cursor-memory-bank?
    pass
    AI named vanzan01/cursor-memory-bank explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts vanzan01/cursor-memory-bank in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named vanzan01/cursor-memory-bank explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo vanzan01/cursor-memory-bank solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named vanzan01/cursor-memory-bank explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of vanzan01/cursor-memory-bank. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/vanzan01/cursor-memory-bank.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/vanzan01/cursor-memory-bank)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/vanzan01/cursor-memory-bank"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/vanzan01/cursor-memory-bank.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

vanzan01/cursor-memory-bank — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite