RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

villesau/ai-codereviewer

Default branch main · commit a9a064df · scanned 5/9/2026, 11:01:54 PM

GitHub: 1,018 stars · 875 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface villesau/ai-codereviewer, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README H1 to specify category and core function

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # AI Code Reviewer
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # AI Code Reviewer: GitHub Action for AI-Powered Pull Request Feedback
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/villesau/ai-codereviewer
  • lowtopics#3
    Expand repository topics with more specific keywords

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ai, code-review, github-actions, openai
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai, code-review, github-actions, openai, pull-request-review, llm, gpt-4, workflow-automation

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface villesau/ai-codereviewer
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
DeepSource
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. DeepSource · recommended 2×
  2. Codiga · recommended 2×
  3. GitHub Copilot for Business · recommended 1×
  4. CodeGuru Reviewer · recommended 1×
  5. SonarCloud · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I automate code reviews with AI directly within my GitHub workflow?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Copilot for Business
    2. CodeGuru Reviewer
    3. DeepSource
    4. SonarCloud
    5. Codiga
    6. Snyk Code
    7. LGTM

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named villesau/ai-codereviewer. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for an AI-powered solution to provide intelligent feedback on pull requests.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Copilot for Pull Requests
    2. CodeRabbit
    3. DeepSource
    4. Codiga
    5. GitLab Duo Code Suggestions
    6. CodiumAI

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named villesau/ai-codereviewer. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of villesau/ai-codereviewer?
    pass
    AI did not name villesau/ai-codereviewer — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts villesau/ai-codereviewer in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named villesau/ai-codereviewer explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo villesau/ai-codereviewer solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named villesau/ai-codereviewer explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of villesau/ai-codereviewer. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/villesau/ai-codereviewer.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/villesau/ai-codereviewer)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/villesau/ai-codereviewer"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/villesau/ai-codereviewer.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

villesau/ai-codereviewer — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite