RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

vision-x-nyu/thinking-in-space

Default branch main · commit 51e089c3 · scanned 6/14/2026, 5:47:49 PM

GitHub: 725 stars · 49 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
22 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface vision-x-nyu/thinking-in-space, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add specific topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    multimodal-llm, spatial-reasoning, computer-vision, benchmark, evaluation, vsi-bench, large-language-models, embodied-ai
  • highreadme#2
    Clarify the repo's role as a benchmark/evaluation framework in the README introduction

    Why:

    CURRENT
    <h1><i>Thinking in Space</i>:</br> How Multimodal Large Language Models See, Remember and Recall Spaces</h1>
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    <h1><i>Thinking in Space</i>:</br> How Multimodal Large Language Models See, Remember and Recall Spaces</h1>
    
    This repository provides the official implementation and evaluation benchmark for VSI-Bench, designed to assess multimodal large language models' ability to perceive, remember, and recall spatial information.
  • mediumabout#3
    Expand the repository description for clarity

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Official repo and evaluation implementation of VSI-Bench
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Official repository and evaluation implementation of VSI-Bench, a benchmark for assessing multimodal large language models' spatial reasoning and memory capabilities.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface vision-x-nyu/thinking-in-space
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
GQA
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. GQA · recommended 2×
  2. ALFRED · recommended 2×
  3. CLEVR · recommended 2×
  4. Matterport3D · recommended 1×
  5. Replica Dataset · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to evaluate multimodal large language models' ability to understand and recall physical spaces?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Matterport3D
    2. Replica Dataset
    3. Habitat-Matterport3D (HM3D)
    4. ScanNet
    5. COCO API
    6. Habitat-Sim
    7. AI2-THOR
    8. PyTorch3D
    9. Open3D
    10. VQAv2
    11. GQA
    12. ALFRED
    13. CLEVR
    14. Amazon Mechanical Turk
    15. Prolific

    AI recommended 15 alternatives but never named vision-x-nyu/thinking-in-space. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are good benchmarks for assessing multimodal LLM spatial reasoning and memory capabilities?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GQA
    2. CLEVR
    3. OK-VQA
    4. Touchdown
    5. ALFRED
    6. NLVR2
    7. COCO-Count

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named vision-x-nyu/thinking-in-space. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of vision-x-nyu/thinking-in-space?
    pass
    AI did not name vision-x-nyu/thinking-in-space — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts vision-x-nyu/thinking-in-space in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named vision-x-nyu/thinking-in-space explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo vision-x-nyu/thinking-in-space solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name vision-x-nyu/thinking-in-space — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of vision-x-nyu/thinking-in-space. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/vision-x-nyu/thinking-in-space.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/vision-x-nyu/thinking-in-space)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/vision-x-nyu/thinking-in-space"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/vision-x-nyu/thinking-in-space.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

vision-x-nyu/thinking-in-space — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite