RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

von-development/awesome-LangGraph

Default branch main · commit 5908ce73 · scanned 6/18/2026, 6:42:55 AM

GitHub: 1,865 stars · 226 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface von-development/awesome-LangGraph, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highhomepage#1
    Add a homepage URL to the repository's About section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/von-development/awesome-LangGraph
  • mediumreadme#2
    Refine README's opening to emphasize its curated 'awesome list' identity

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The definitive index of frameworks, templates, and real-world projects for teams that want to build, observe, evaluate, and deploy stateful, tool-using AI agents with the LangChain + LangGraph stack.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    This is the definitive, community-curated **awesome list** for the LangChain + LangGraph ecosystem, indexing frameworks, templates, and real-world projects for teams building, observing, evaluating, and deploying stateful, tool-using AI agents.
  • lowtopics#3
    Expand topics to include key lifecycle stages mentioned in README

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ai, awesome, awesome-list, langchain, langgraph, llm, llm-agents
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai, awesome, awesome-list, langchain, langgraph, llm, llm-agents, llm-observability, llm-evaluation, llm-deployment

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface von-development/awesome-LangGraph
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LangChain
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LangChain · recommended 2×
  2. LlamaIndex · recommended 2×
  3. Awesome-LLM-Agents · recommended 1×
  4. Hugging Face · recommended 1×
  5. AgentVerse · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Where can I find a comprehensive index of tools for building and deploying LLM agents?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Awesome-LLM-Agents
    2. LangChain
    3. LlamaIndex
    4. Hugging Face
    5. AgentVerse
    6. OpenAI
    7. Google AI Studio / Vertex AI

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named von-development/awesome-LangGraph. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What resources exist for observing, evaluating, and deploying advanced AI agent applications?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LangSmith
    3. Arize AI
    4. Phoenix
    5. Weights & Biases
    6. W&B Prompts
    7. MLflow
    8. OpenTelemetry
    9. Jaeger
    10. Grafana
    11. Datadog
    12. LlamaIndex
    13. LlamaHub
    14. LlamaPack

    AI recommended 14 alternatives but never named von-development/awesome-LangGraph. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of von-development/awesome-LangGraph?
    pass
    AI did not name von-development/awesome-LangGraph — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts von-development/awesome-LangGraph in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named von-development/awesome-LangGraph explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo von-development/awesome-LangGraph solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named von-development/awesome-LangGraph explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of von-development/awesome-LangGraph. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/von-development/awesome-LangGraph.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/von-development/awesome-LangGraph)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/von-development/awesome-LangGraph"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/von-development/awesome-LangGraph.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

von-development/awesome-LangGraph — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite