RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

wangxiao5791509/Single_Object_Tracking_Paper_List

Default branch main · commit 7786327c · scanned 6/8/2026, 6:33:00 PM

GitHub: 524 stars · 71 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
10 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
0 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface wangxiao5791509/Single_Object_Tracking_Paper_List, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening sentence to clarify its purpose as a paper list

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Paper list for single object tracking (Modified from [benchmark_results] and continue to Update this list)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A comprehensive and continuously updated **curated list of academic papers** on single object tracking (SOT), including state-of-the-art trackers.
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (none)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    single-object-tracking, sot, object-tracking, paper-list, research-papers, computer-vision, deep-learning
  • highlicense#3
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (no LICENSE file detected — the repo has no recognizable license)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file in the repository root with a standard open-source license (e.g., MIT License).

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface wangxiao5791509/Single_Object_Tracking_Paper_List
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
DeepSORT
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. DeepSORT · recommended 1×
  2. ByteTrack · recommended 1×
  3. FairMOT · recommended 1×
  4. StrongSORT · recommended 1×
  5. OC-SORT · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the most effective visual tracking algorithms for single objects in video streams?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. DeepSORT
    2. ByteTrack
    3. FairMOT
    4. StrongSORT
    5. OC-SORT
    6. SiamRPN++
    7. DaSiamRPN

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named wangxiao5791509/Single_Object_Tracking_Paper_List. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Where can I find a comprehensive list of modern techniques for real-time single object tracking?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Papers With Code
    2. arXiv
    3. CVPR
    4. ICCV
    5. ECCV
    6. VOT
    7. OTB
    8. LaSOT
    9. GOT-10k
    10. awesome-visual-tracking

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named wangxiao5791509/Single_Object_Tracking_Paper_List. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of wangxiao5791509/Single_Object_Tracking_Paper_List?
    pass
    AI did not name wangxiao5791509/Single_Object_Tracking_Paper_List — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts wangxiao5791509/Single_Object_Tracking_Paper_List in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI did not name wangxiao5791509/Single_Object_Tracking_Paper_List — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo wangxiao5791509/Single_Object_Tracking_Paper_List solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name wangxiao5791509/Single_Object_Tracking_Paper_List — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of wangxiao5791509/Single_Object_Tracking_Paper_List. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/wangxiao5791509/Single_Object_Tracking_Paper_List.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/wangxiao5791509/Single_Object_Tracking_Paper_List)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/wangxiao5791509/Single_Object_Tracking_Paper_List"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/wangxiao5791509/Single_Object_Tracking_Paper_List.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

wangxiao5791509/Single_Object_Tracking_Paper_List — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite