RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

wbopan/cui

Default branch main · commit cef7750f · scanned 5/24/2026, 4:42:06 PM

GitHub: 1,151 stars · 110 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface wbopan/cui, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Clarify the project's core identity immediately after the H1 in the README

    Why:

    CURRENT
    > **This fork is archived.** Anthropic now offers official alternatives that cover all of cui's use cases. See below for migration guidance.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A modern web UI for Claude Code agents, powered by Claude Code SDK. > **This fork is archived.** Anthropic now offers official alternatives that cover all of cui's use cases. See below for migration guidance.
  • mediumreadme#2
    Resolve license discrepancy between repository metadata and README

    Why:

    CURRENT
    [MIT](LICENSE)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    This project is licensed under the Apache-2.0 License. The upstream project (BMPixel/cui) was licensed under MIT.
  • lowhomepage#3
    Add a homepage link to the official Claude Code Web solution

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://claude.ai/code

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface wbopan/cui
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
jupyterlab/jupyterlab
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. jupyterlab/jupyterlab · recommended 2×
  2. microsoft/vscode · recommended 2×
  3. streamlit/streamlit · recommended 2×
  4. Google Colaboratory · recommended 2×
  5. gradio-app/gradio · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to get a browser-based interface for interacting with my AI coding assistant?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. JupyterLab / Jupyter Notebook (jupyterlab/jupyterlab)
    2. VS Code (microsoft/vscode)
    3. Streamlit (streamlit/streamlit)
    4. Gradio (gradio-app/gradio)
    5. Google Colaboratory
    6. Replit

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named wbopan/cui. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a tool to remotely control AI agent sessions from a web browser.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. JupyterLab/Jupyter Notebook (jupyterlab/jupyterlab)
    2. VS Code Remote Development (microsoft/vscode)
    3. Google Colaboratory
    4. AWS Cloud9
    5. Databricks Workspace
    6. TensorFlow Playground
    7. Flask (pallets/flask)
    8. Django (django/django)
    9. Streamlit (streamlit/streamlit)

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named wbopan/cui. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of wbopan/cui?
    pass
    AI named wbopan/cui explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts wbopan/cui in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named wbopan/cui explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo wbopan/cui solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named wbopan/cui explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of wbopan/cui. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/wbopan/cui.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/wbopan/cui)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/wbopan/cui"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/wbopan/cui.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

wbopan/cui — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite