RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

wcventure/FuzzingPaper

Default branch master · commit 98794b36 · scanned 6/21/2026, 6:43:09 PM

GitHub: 2,760 stars · 371 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface wcventure/FuzzingPaper, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening to clearly state its purpose as a paper collection

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Recent Papers Related To Fuzzing

1. This website is only used for collecting and grouping the related paper. If there are any paper need to be updated, you can contribute PR.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # FuzzingPaper: A Curated Collection of Recent Fuzzing Research Papers

This repository provides a comprehensive and continuously updated collection of academic papers focused on fuzzing research. It serves as a central resource for tracking the latest advancements in fuzzing techniques and software security. Contributions are welcome.
  • mediumabout#2
    Update the repository description to be more explicit

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Recent Fuzzing Paper
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A curated collection and database of recent academic papers on fuzzing research.
  • lowtopics#3
    Expand GitHub topics to reinforce its nature as a research resource

    Why:

    CURRENT
    fuzz-testing, fuzzing, fuzzing-paper, testing
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    fuzz-testing, fuzzing, fuzzing-paper, testing, academic-papers, research-papers, literature-review

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface wcventure/FuzzingPaper
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Fuzzing.info
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Fuzzing.info · recommended 1×
  2. Google Scholar · recommended 1×
  3. arXiv.org · recommended 1×
  4. USENIX Security Symposium · recommended 1×
  5. ACM CCS · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Where can I find a curated list of recent research papers on fuzz testing techniques?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Fuzzing.info
    2. Google Scholar
    3. arXiv.org
    4. USENIX Security Symposium
    5. ACM CCS
    6. IEEE S&P
    7. NDSS
    8. ISSTA
    9. ACM Digital Library
    10. IEEE Xplore
    11. GitHub
    12. awesome-fuzzing (cpuwan/awesome-fuzzing)
    13. awesome-security (carpedm20/awesome-security)

    AI recommended 13 alternatives but never named wcventure/FuzzingPaper. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the latest advancements and academic publications in software fuzzing research?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. AFL++
    2. LibFuzzer
    3. Honggfuzz
    4. Syzkaller
    5. Fuzzilli
    6. Domato
    7. BooFuzz

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named wcventure/FuzzingPaper. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of wcventure/FuzzingPaper?
    pass
    AI named wcventure/FuzzingPaper explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts wcventure/FuzzingPaper in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named wcventure/FuzzingPaper explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo wcventure/FuzzingPaper solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named wcventure/FuzzingPaper explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of wcventure/FuzzingPaper. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/wcventure/FuzzingPaper.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/wcventure/FuzzingPaper)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/wcventure/FuzzingPaper"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/wcventure/FuzzingPaper.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

wcventure/FuzzingPaper — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite