RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

wentorai/Research-Claw

Default branch main · commit 137c028c · scanned 6/12/2026, 4:21:57 PM

GitHub: 833 stars · 111 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface wentorai/Research-Claw, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README H1/tagline to clearly state its function and local nature

    Why:

    CURRENT
    AI 时代，谁还不能是个导师了？ 你做导师，科研龙虾做团队。24/7 本地运行，一切产出专属于你。
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Research-Claw is your 24/7 **local AI research assistant**, designed to automate literature reviews, paper drafting, and data management, ensuring all your research output remains private and on your machine.
  • hightopics#2
    Add descriptive topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-assistant, research-automation, literature-review, academic-tools, llm-applications, local-ai, zotero-integration, paper-writing, academic-research
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add the project homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://wentor.ai

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface wentorai/Research-Claw
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Elicit
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Elicit · recommended 1×
  2. Scite.ai · recommended 1×
  3. Connected Papers · recommended 1×
  4. Semantic Scholar · recommended 1×
  5. ResearchRabbit · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What AI tools can help automate literature reviews and research paper drafting?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Elicit
    2. Scite.ai
    3. Connected Papers
    4. Semantic Scholar
    5. ResearchRabbit
    6. ChatGPT/GPT-4
    7. QuillBot

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named wentorai/Research-Claw. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a local AI assistant to manage research papers and data privately.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Obsidian
    2. Dataview
    3. Zotero Integration
    4. Smart Connections
    5. Ollama
    6. LM Studio
    7. Zotero
    8. Zotero PDF Translate
    9. Zotero GPT
    10. DevonThink
    11. Logseq
    12. Mem.ai
    13. Python
    14. Llama.cpp
    15. LangChain
    16. LlamaIndex

    AI recommended 16 alternatives but never named wentorai/Research-Claw. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of wentorai/Research-Claw?
    pass
    AI named wentorai/Research-Claw explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts wentorai/Research-Claw in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named wentorai/Research-Claw explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo wentorai/Research-Claw solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named wentorai/Research-Claw explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of wentorai/Research-Claw. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/wentorai/Research-Claw.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/wentorai/Research-Claw)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/wentorai/Research-Claw"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/wentorai/Research-Claw.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

wentorai/Research-Claw — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite