RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

xiaopu-ai/web-design

Default branch main · commit 22a4f482 · scanned 6/25/2026, 6:57:02 PM

GitHub: 553 stars · 50 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
33 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface xiaopu-ai/web-design, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Strengthen README's opening to highlight 'spec-first' AI skill and its input types

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # web-design
    
    **A Claude Code SKILL for designing beautiful, consistent web pages — spec first, code second.**
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # web-design
    
    **A Claude Code SKILL for designing beautiful, consistent web pages — spec first, code second.**
    
    This AI skill takes a PRD, reference URL, or screenshot as input and first generates a detailed, editable `DESIGN.md` specification. Only after this 'spec-first' approach is approved does it produce the final web code, ensuring UI, visuals, motion, and responsiveness are consistent and portable.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Update repository topics to remove typo and add AI assistant keywords

    Why:

    CURRENT
    claude-code, claude-skill, design-system, we-b, web-design, webdesign, xiaopu
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    claude-code, claude-skill, design-system, web-design, webdesign, xiaopu, ai-assistant, prompt-engineering, design-spec-generation, code-generation
  • lowcomparison#3
    Add a 'Why not Figma/Anima?' comparison section to README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## 🆚 How is this different from Figma, Anima, or Locofy.ai?
    
    Unlike visual design tools or low-code builders, `web-design` is an AI skill that generates a full design specification (`DESIGN.md`) *before* producing any code. This 'spec-first' approach ensures consistency, editability, and portability, making it an AI assistant for design system generation and code implementation, rather than a manual design canvas or drag-and-drop builder.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface xiaopu-ai/web-design
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Figma
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Figma · recommended 2×
  2. Anima · recommended 2×
  3. Locofy.ai · recommended 2×
  4. Uizard · recommended 2×
  5. ChatGPT · recommended 2×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What AI can turn a PRD or image into a detailed web design spec and code?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Figma
    2. Builder.io's Figma plugin
    3. Anima
    4. Locofy.ai
    5. Uizard
    6. Durable.co
    7. Microsoft Designer
    8. Power Apps
    9. ChatGPT
    10. Google Gemini

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named xiaopu-ai/web-design. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for an AI assistant that generates a full design system specification before coding.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Figma
    2. Anima
    3. Relume AI
    4. Builder.io
    5. Locofy.ai
    6. Uizard
    7. Storybook
    8. Storybook AI
    9. GitHub Copilot
    10. ChatGPT

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named xiaopu-ai/web-design. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of xiaopu-ai/web-design?
    pass
    AI named xiaopu-ai/web-design explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts xiaopu-ai/web-design in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named xiaopu-ai/web-design explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo xiaopu-ai/web-design solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name xiaopu-ai/web-design — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of xiaopu-ai/web-design. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/xiaopu-ai/web-design.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/xiaopu-ai/web-design)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/xiaopu-ai/web-design"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/xiaopu-ai/web-design.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

xiaopu-ai/web-design — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite