RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

xoai/sage-wiki

Default branch main · commit c8761cbe · scanned 6/2/2026, 9:47:22 PM

GitHub: 529 stars · 90 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
23 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface xoai/sage-wiki, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface xoai/sage-wiki
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Obsidian
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Obsidian · recommended 2×
  2. Logseq · recommended 2×
  3. Notion · recommended 2×
  4. Zotero · recommended 1×
  5. DEVONthink · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to automatically organize research papers and notes into a smart, searchable knowledge base?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Zotero
    2. Obsidian
    3. DEVONthink
    4. Readwise Reader
    5. Mendeley
    6. Logseq
    7. Notion

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named xoai/sage-wiki. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools use LLMs to build an interconnected personal wiki from scattered documents?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Obsidian
    2. Smart Connections
    3. Text Generator
    4. Dataview
    5. Mem.ai
    6. Mem X
    7. Logseq
    8. SmartBlocks
    9. TiddlyWiki
    10. Notion
    11. Notion AI
    12. Personal AI (Pi)

    AI recommended 12 alternatives but never named xoai/sage-wiki. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of xoai/sage-wiki?
    pass
    AI did not name xoai/sage-wiki — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts xoai/sage-wiki in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named xoai/sage-wiki explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo xoai/sage-wiki solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named xoai/sage-wiki explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of xoai/sage-wiki. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/xoai/sage-wiki.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/xoai/sage-wiki)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/xoai/sage-wiki"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/xoai/sage-wiki.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

xoai/sage-wiki — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite