RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

yuezk/chatgpt-mirror

Default branch main · commit 941f1ffb · scanned 5/24/2026, 1:53:13 PM

GitHub: 1,226 stars · 314 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface yuezk/chatgpt-mirror, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highlicense#1
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository root

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (no LICENSE file detected)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file in the repository root with the full text of the MIT License.
  • hightopics#2
    Expand repository topics to include self-hosting and UI terms

    Why:

    CURRENT
    chatgpt, chatgpt-api, openai, openai-api
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    chatgpt, chatgpt-api, openai, openai-api, self-hosted, web-ui, local-llm-ui, llm-interface
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/Yuezk/ChatbotUI

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface yuezk/chatgpt-mirror
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LM Studio
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LM Studio · recommended 1×
  2. Ollama · recommended 1×
  3. Open WebUI · recommended 1×
  4. oobabooga/text-generation-webui · recommended 1×
  5. LocalAI · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I self-host a web interface for a large language model API?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LM Studio
    2. Ollama
    3. Open WebUI
    4. text-generation-webui (oobabooga/text-generation-webui)
    5. LocalAI
    6. Gradio
    7. Streamlit
    8. Next.js
    9. Vercel AI SDK

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named yuezk/chatgpt-mirror. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are options for deploying a local chat UI with the gpt-3.5-turbo API?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenAI Python Library (openai/openai-python)
    2. Streamlit (streamlit/streamlit)
    3. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    4. Gradio (gradio-app/gradio)
    5. LlamaIndex (run-llama/llama_index)
    6. Flask (pallets/flask)
    7. Django (django/django)
    8. Next.js (vercel/next.js)
    9. Express (expressjs/express)
    10. FastAPI (tiangolo/fastapi)

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named yuezk/chatgpt-mirror. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of yuezk/chatgpt-mirror?
    pass
    AI named yuezk/chatgpt-mirror explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts yuezk/chatgpt-mirror in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named yuezk/chatgpt-mirror explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo yuezk/chatgpt-mirror solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named yuezk/chatgpt-mirror explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of yuezk/chatgpt-mirror. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/yuezk/chatgpt-mirror.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/yuezk/chatgpt-mirror)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/yuezk/chatgpt-mirror"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/yuezk/chatgpt-mirror.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

yuezk/chatgpt-mirror — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite