RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

yzfly/Awesome-AGI-Agents

Default branch main · commit e4b184de · scanned 6/9/2026, 1:17:28 AM

GitHub: 535 stars · 36 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
33 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface yzfly/Awesome-AGI-Agents, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README to explicitly state it's an 'awesome list' or 'curated collection'

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Awesome-AGI-Agents

Agents (智能体) 精选资源合集，持续更新中
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Awesome-AGI-Agents

This is a continuously updated, comprehensive **awesome list** and curated collection of resources for AGI Agents (智能体), including papers, projects, development platforms, and other curated lists.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add 'awesome-list' to repository topics

    Why:

    CURRENT
    agents, agents-art, agi, agi-agents, ai, ai-agents, artificial-intelligence, chatgpt, claude-ai, deep-learning, gpt-4, gpt-5, llm
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    agents, agents-art, agi, agi-agents, ai, ai-agents, artificial-intelligence, chatgpt, claude-ai, deep-learning, gpt-4, gpt-5, llm, awesome-list
  • lowreadme#3
    Clarify the existing license in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## License

This project is licensed under the terms detailed in the [LICENSE](LICENSE) file.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface yzfly/Awesome-AGI-Agents
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LangChain
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LangChain · recommended 1×
  2. LlamaIndex · recommended 1×
  3. AutoGPT · recommended 1×
  4. Microsoft Semantic Kernel · recommended 1×
  5. Haystack · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best frameworks and platforms for developing autonomous AI agents using large language models?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. AutoGPT
    4. Microsoft Semantic Kernel
    5. Haystack
    6. CrewAI
    7. BabyAGI

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named yzfly/Awesome-AGI-Agents. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Where can I find a comprehensive collection of resources and research on AGI agents and their applications?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. AI Impacts
    2. LessWrong
    3. OpenAI Research Blog & Publications
    4. DeepMind Publications
    5. Future of Humanity Institute (FHI) Publications
    6. arXiv.org
    7. Alignment Forum

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named yzfly/Awesome-AGI-Agents. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of yzfly/Awesome-AGI-Agents?
    pass
    AI did not name yzfly/Awesome-AGI-Agents — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts yzfly/Awesome-AGI-Agents in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named yzfly/Awesome-AGI-Agents explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo yzfly/Awesome-AGI-Agents solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named yzfly/Awesome-AGI-Agents explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of yzfly/Awesome-AGI-Agents. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/yzfly/Awesome-AGI-Agents.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/yzfly/Awesome-AGI-Agents)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/yzfly/Awesome-AGI-Agents"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/yzfly/Awesome-AGI-Agents.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

yzfly/Awesome-AGI-Agents — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite