RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

zakirkun/guardian-cli

Default branch main · commit 51864a81 · scanned 7/1/2026, 9:57:03 AM

GitHub: 1,716 stars · 356 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
22 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface zakirkun/guardian-cli, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README H1 to clarify project identity

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # 🔐 Guardian
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # 🔐 Guardian: AI-Powered Pentesting CLI
  • mediumabout#2
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Your project's official website URL
  • mediumlicense#3
    Clarify the project's license in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## 📄 License

This project is licensed under [Specify the actual license(s) here, e.g., 'a custom license combining MIT and Apache-2.0 terms']. Please refer to the [LICENSE](LICENSE) file for full details.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface zakirkun/guardian-cli
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
rapid7/metasploit-framework
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. rapid7/metasploit-framework · recommended 2×
  2. PlexTrac · recommended 1×
  3. projectdiscovery/nuclei · recommended 1×
  4. Invicti · recommended 1×
  5. Acunetix · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What AI-powered tools exist for automating comprehensive penetration testing workflows?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. PlexTrac
    2. Nuclei (projectdiscovery/nuclei)
    3. Invicti
    4. Acunetix
    5. OpenVAS (greenbone/openvas)
    6. Greenbone Vulnerability Management (GVM) (greenbone/gvm)
    7. Metasploit Framework (rapid7/metasploit-framework)
    8. ImmuniWeb
    9. HackerOne
    10. Bugcrowd

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named zakirkun/guardian-cli. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to leverage generative AI models for ethical hacking and security vulnerability detection?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenAI GPT-4
    2. GPT-3.5
    3. Claude 3
    4. Google Gemini
    5. GitHub Copilot
    6. GitLab Duo Code Suggestions
    7. Hugging Face Transformers (huggingface/transformers)
    8. CodeBERT
    9. CodeT5
    10. SecBERT
    11. Metasploit Framework (rapid7/metasploit-framework)
    12. OWASP ZAP (zaproxy/zaproxy)
    13. DeepCode AI
    14. Snyk Code

    AI recommended 14 alternatives but never named zakirkun/guardian-cli. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of zakirkun/guardian-cli?
    pass
    AI did not name zakirkun/guardian-cli — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts zakirkun/guardian-cli in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI did not name zakirkun/guardian-cli — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo zakirkun/guardian-cli solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named zakirkun/guardian-cli explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of zakirkun/guardian-cli. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/zakirkun/guardian-cli.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/zakirkun/guardian-cli)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/zakirkun/guardian-cli"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/zakirkun/guardian-cli.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

zakirkun/guardian-cli — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite