RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

zengwenliang416/ppt-agent

Default branch main · commit 63da33fd · scanned 6/16/2026, 5:13:19 AM

GitHub: 810 stars · 100 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
30 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface zengwenliang416/ppt-agent, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Add a concise repository description

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    An open-source multi-agent workflow for generating AI-powered presentation slides (PPT/SVG) from text prompts, supporting various LLMs and custom branding.
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-agent, llm, presentation-generator, powerpoint, ppt, multi-agent-system, generative-ai, svg-generation, workflow, open-source
  • highlicense#3
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (no LICENSE file detected — the repo has no recognizable license)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file (e.g., MIT License) in the repository root to clearly state the terms of use.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface zengwenliang416/ppt-agent
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Gamma
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Gamma · recommended 2×
  2. Tome · recommended 2×
  3. Beautiful.ai · recommended 2×
  4. Plus AI for Google Slides · recommended 2×
  5. Microsoft Copilot (with PowerPoint) · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I use AI to automatically generate professional presentation slides from a text prompt?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Gamma
    2. Tome
    3. Beautiful.ai
    4. Plus AI for Google Slides
    5. Microsoft Copilot (with PowerPoint)
    6. Canva Magic Design for Presentations

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named zengwenliang416/ppt-agent. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools help automate presentation slide creation and review using an LLM-driven workflow?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Gamma
    2. Tome
    3. Beautiful.ai
    4. Plus AI for Google Slides
    5. Microsoft 365 Copilot (for PowerPoint)
    6. Canva Magic Design
    7. ChatGPT
    8. Claude
    9. Gemini
    10. Google Slides
    11. PowerPoint
    12. Keynote

    AI recommended 12 alternatives but never named zengwenliang416/ppt-agent. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of zengwenliang416/ppt-agent?
    pass
    AI named zengwenliang416/ppt-agent explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts zengwenliang416/ppt-agent in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named zengwenliang416/ppt-agent explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo zengwenliang416/ppt-agent solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named zengwenliang416/ppt-agent explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of zengwenliang416/ppt-agent. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/zengwenliang416/ppt-agent.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/zengwenliang416/ppt-agent)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/zengwenliang416/ppt-agent"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/zengwenliang416/ppt-agent.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

zengwenliang416/ppt-agent — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite