RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

zephyrwang6/pm-skills

Default branch main · commit 404e0cae · scanned 6/1/2026, 11:07:53 PM

GitHub: 682 stars · 156 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
30 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface zephyrwang6/pm-skills, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Clarify README H1 and opening statement for AI

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # pm-skills

> 产品经理把自己的工作全部外包给 AI 的尝试。
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # pm-skills: 产品经理 AI 自动化技能集

一套为产品经理设计的 Claude Code Skill 集合，旨在通过 AI 自动化日常工作，从文档撰写到数据分析，全面提升效率。
  • highabout#2
    Add a concise repository description

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    一套为产品经理设计的 Claude Code Skill 集合，旨在通过 AI 自动化日常工作，从文档撰写到数据分析，全面提升效率。
  • hightopics#3
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    product-management, ai-tools, claude-code, automation, pm-skills, product-manager, generative-ai

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface zephyrwang6/pm-skills
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
ClickUp
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. ClickUp · recommended 1×
  2. Jira Product Discovery · recommended 1×
  3. Productboard · recommended 1×
  4. Aha! · recommended 1×
  5. Notion · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking AI tools to streamline product management documentation, planning, and review processes.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. ClickUp
    2. Jira Product Discovery
    3. Productboard
    4. Aha!
    5. Notion
    6. Coda
    7. Confluence

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named zephyrwang6/pm-skills. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What AI solutions help product managers with data analysis, experimentation, and competitive analysis?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Amplitude
    2. Mixpanel
    3. Heap
    4. Similarweb
    5. App Annie (now data.ai)
    6. Tableau
    7. Power BI
    8. ChatGPT Enterprise
    9. Google Gemini Advanced

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named zephyrwang6/pm-skills. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of zephyrwang6/pm-skills?
    pass
    AI named zephyrwang6/pm-skills explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts zephyrwang6/pm-skills in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named zephyrwang6/pm-skills explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo zephyrwang6/pm-skills solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named zephyrwang6/pm-skills explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of zephyrwang6/pm-skills. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/zephyrwang6/pm-skills.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/zephyrwang6/pm-skills)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/zephyrwang6/pm-skills"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/zephyrwang6/pm-skills.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

zephyrwang6/pm-skills — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite