RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

zerobootdev/zeroboot

Default branch main · commit 87ca9c01 · scanned 5/10/2026, 8:08:10 AM

GitHub: 2,310 stars · 98 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface zerobootdev/zeroboot, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Elevate the core value proposition to an H1 in the README

    Why:

    CURRENT
    <p align="center"><strong>Sub-millisecond VM sandboxes for AI agents via copy-on-write forking</strong></p>
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Replace the `<p align="center"><strong>...</strong></p>` block with: `# Zeroboot: Sub-millisecond VM Sandboxes for AI Agents` and ensure the first paragraph immediately clarifies "Zeroboot provides ultra-low-latency, hardware-isolated virtual machine sandboxes for AI agents, leveraging copy-on-write forking for near-instantaneous spin-up."
  • highabout#2
    Clarify the "About" description to emphasize AI agent sandboxing

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Sub-millisecond VM sandboxes for AI agents via copy-on-write forking
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Ultra-low-latency, hardware-isolated VM sandboxes for AI agents, enabling secure and efficient code execution through copy-on-write forking.
  • mediumtopics#3
    Add more specific topics to improve category visibility

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ai-agents, code-execution, copy-on-write, firecracker, kvm, rust, sandbox, virtual-machine, vm
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-agents, code-execution, copy-on-write, firecracker, kvm, rust, sandbox, virtual-machine, vm, secure-code-execution, low-latency-vm, hardware-isolation, ai-agent-sandbox

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface zerobootdev/zeroboot
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
kata-containers/kata-containers
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. kata-containers/kata-containers · recommended 1×
  2. cloud-hypervisor/cloud-hypervisor · recommended 1×
  3. firecracker-microvm/firecracker · recommended 1×
  4. google/gvisor · recommended 1×
  5. Intel SGX · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to get sub-millisecond VM sandboxes for AI agents with hardware isolation?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Kata Containers (kata-containers/kata-containers)
    2. Cloud Hypervisor (cloud-hypervisor/cloud-hypervisor)
    3. Firecracker (firecracker-microvm/firecracker)
    4. gVisor (google/gvisor)
    5. Intel SGX
    6. AMD SEV
    7. NVIDIA MIG
    8. KVM
    9. Xen (xen-project/xen)

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named zerobootdev/zeroboot. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for efficient virtual machine sandboxes for secure code execution with minimal overhead.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Firecracker
    2. gVisor
    3. Kata Containers
    4. Cloud Hypervisor
    5. QEMU/KVM

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named zerobootdev/zeroboot. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of zerobootdev/zeroboot?
    pass
    AI named zerobootdev/zeroboot explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts zerobootdev/zeroboot in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named zerobootdev/zeroboot explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo zerobootdev/zeroboot solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named zerobootdev/zeroboot explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of zerobootdev/zeroboot. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/zerobootdev/zeroboot.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/zerobootdev/zeroboot)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/zerobootdev/zeroboot"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/zerobootdev/zeroboot.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

zerobootdev/zeroboot — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite