RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

zhouxiaoka/autoclip

Default branch main · commit 17100c05 · scanned 6/20/2026, 3:06:35 AM

GitHub: 5,691 stars · 1,137 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface zhouxiaoka/autoclip, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Add a clear, concise open-source positioning statement to the README's introduction.

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    AutoClip is an open-source, self-hostable AI tool for automatic video highlight extraction and clipping from YouTube/Bilibili videos, offering a powerful alternative to commercial SaaS solutions.
  • mediumcomparison#2
    Add a 'Comparison to Alternatives' section in the README.

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## 🆚 Comparison to Alternatives

Unlike commercial SaaS solutions such as Opus Clip, Pictory, or Synthesia, AutoClip is an open-source, self-hostable project. This gives users full control over their data and infrastructure, making it ideal for developers and content creators who prioritize privacy, customization, and cost-effectiveness for automatic video highlight extraction from existing long-form content (e.g., YouTube, Bilibili).
  • lowtopics#3
    Add more specific topics to highlight open-source and platform support.

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ai, ai-agents, ai-tools, ai-video, ai-video-editor, auto, auto-highlight, highlight, llm, video, video-editing, video-processing, videos
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai, ai-agents, ai-tools, ai-video, ai-video-editor, auto, auto-highlight, highlight, llm, video, video-editing, video-processing, videos, open-source, self-hosted, youtube-downloader, bilibili-downloader

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface zhouxiaoka/autoclip
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Synthesia
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Synthesia · recommended 2×
  2. Vidyo.ai · recommended 2×
  3. Opus Clip · recommended 1×
  4. Pictory · recommended 1×
  5. Adobe Premiere Pro · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to automatically extract engaging highlights from long videos using AI?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Opus Clip
    2. Pictory
    3. Synthesia
    4. Adobe Premiere Pro
    5. DaVinci Resolve
    6. Kapwing
    7. Vidyo.ai

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named zhouxiaoka/autoclip. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Tool to automate video content creation, including downloading, AI analysis, and clip generation?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Synthesia
    2. Descript
    3. Vidyo.ai
    4. InVideo
    5. Peech
    6. OpenAI's Whisper
    7. FFmpeg
    8. Zapier
    9. Make

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named zhouxiaoka/autoclip. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of zhouxiaoka/autoclip?
    pass
    AI named zhouxiaoka/autoclip explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts zhouxiaoka/autoclip in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named zhouxiaoka/autoclip explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo zhouxiaoka/autoclip solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named zhouxiaoka/autoclip explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of zhouxiaoka/autoclip. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/zhouxiaoka/autoclip.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/zhouxiaoka/autoclip)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/zhouxiaoka/autoclip"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/zhouxiaoka/autoclip.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

zhouxiaoka/autoclip — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite