RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

zsyggg/paper-craft-skills

Default branch main · commit 3be47a2a · scanned 6/16/2026, 11:42:54 PM

GitHub: 509 stars · 28 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface zsyggg/paper-craft-skills, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Clarify the README's main heading to prevent miscategorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # paper-craft-skills
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # paper-craft-skills

**AI-powered tools for academic paper analysis and visualization.**
  • highlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file to clarify usage terms

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file (e.g., MIT or Apache-2.0) in the repository root.
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a relevant URL (e.g., a project website, documentation, or a demo page) to the 'Homepage' field in the repository settings.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface zsyggg/paper-craft-skills
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
ChatGPT
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. ChatGPT · recommended 2×
  2. Elicit · recommended 2×
  3. GPT-4 · recommended 1×
  4. Matplotlib · recommended 1×
  5. Plotly · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to automatically generate visual summaries or figures from academic papers?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. ChatGPT
    2. GPT-4
    3. Matplotlib
    4. Plotly
    5. Midjourney
    6. DALL-E 3
    7. Miro
    8. Lucidchart
    9. draw.io
    10. Seaborn
    11. ggplot2
    12. Stable Diffusion
    13. BioRender
    14. ChemDraw
    15. Semantic Scholar's TLDRs
    16. Elicit
    17. PowerPoint
    18. Google Slides
    19. Canva
    20. Adobe Illustrator

    AI recommended 20 alternatives but never named zsyggg/paper-craft-skills. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Need an AI tool to transform research papers into presentation slides and deep-dive articles.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. ChatGPT
    2. AskYourPDF
    3. ScholarAI
    4. WebPilot
    5. Elicit
    6. Scite.ai
    7. Beautiful.ai
    8. Gamma
    9. Tome

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named zsyggg/paper-craft-skills. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of zsyggg/paper-craft-skills?
    pass
    AI did not name zsyggg/paper-craft-skills — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts zsyggg/paper-craft-skills in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named zsyggg/paper-craft-skills explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo zsyggg/paper-craft-skills solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named zsyggg/paper-craft-skills explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of zsyggg/paper-craft-skills. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/zsyggg/paper-craft-skills.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/zsyggg/paper-craft-skills)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/zsyggg/paper-craft-skills"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/zsyggg/paper-craft-skills.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

zsyggg/paper-craft-skills — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite