RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

zuoban/tts

Default branch main · commit 18a99782 · scanned 6/4/2026, 2:53:28 PM

GitHub: 623 stars · 140 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface zuoban/tts, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening sentence to highlight key features

    Why:

    CURRENT
    一个现代化的文本转语音 (TTS) 服务，基于 Microsoft Azure 语音服务，采用前后端分离架构，提供高质量的语音合成能力。
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    一个现代化的、**自托管**的文本转语音 (TTS) 服务，**基于 Go 后端和 React 前端**，利用 Microsoft Azure 语音服务提供高质量语音合成，并**完全兼容 OpenAI TTS API**。
  • mediumtopics#2
    Expand repository topics to include key technologies and features

    Why:

    CURRENT
    go, tts
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    go, tts, react, azure, openai-api, self-hosted, docker, cloudflare-worker, text-to-speech, speech-synthesis
  • mediumabout#3
    Update the repository description for clarity and specificity

    Why:

    CURRENT
    tts 服务
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    自托管的 Go/React TTS 服务，基于 Azure 语音，兼容 OpenAI API。

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface zuoban/tts
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Rhasspy
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Rhasspy · recommended 1×
  2. Coqui TTS · recommended 1×
  3. eSpeak-NG · recommended 1×
  4. MaryTTS · recommended 1×
  5. Piper TTS · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Need a self-hosted text-to-speech solution with a Go backend and web UI.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Rhasspy
    2. Coqui TTS
    3. eSpeak-NG
    4. MaryTTS
    5. Piper TTS

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named zuoban/tts. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for an OpenAI compatible TTS API service supporting multiple languages.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenAI TTS API
    2. ElevenLabs
    3. Google Cloud Text-to-Speech
    4. Amazon Polly
    5. Microsoft Azure AI Speech
    6. Play.ht

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named zuoban/tts. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of zuoban/tts?
    pass
    AI named zuoban/tts explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts zuoban/tts in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named zuoban/tts explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo zuoban/tts solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named zuoban/tts explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of zuoban/tts. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/zuoban/tts.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/zuoban/tts)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/zuoban/tts"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/zuoban/tts.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

zuoban/tts — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite