RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

Spirit-AI-Team/spirit-v1.5

Default branch main · commit 6d67377f · scanned 6/6/2026, 2:58:09 AM

GitHub: 590 stars · 34 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface Spirit-AI-Team/spirit-v1.5, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    robotics, foundation-model, vision-language-model, vla, robot-control, ai-robotics, deep-learning
  • highreadme#2
    Strengthen the README's introductory paragraph

    Why:

    CURRENT
    This repository contains the official implementation of the **Spirit-v1.5 VLA model**, as well as the runtime wrapper required to reproduce our results on the RoboChallenge benchmark.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    This repository contains the official implementation of the **Spirit-v1.5 VLA model**, a state-of-the-art robotic foundation model designed to enable advanced robotic manipulation capabilities. It includes the runtime wrapper required to reproduce our results on the RoboChallenge benchmark, where Spirit-v1.5 currently ranks **#1**.
  • mediumreadme#3
    Add a 'Key Features' section to highlight differentiators

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## Key Features
    
    - **State-of-the-Art VLA Model:** Spirit-v1.5 is a Vision-Language-Action (VLA) model, specifically designed for complex robotic control.
    - **RoboChallenge Benchmark Leader:** Currently ranks #1 on the RoboChallenge Table30 benchmark, demonstrating superior performance in robotic manipulation.
    - **Open-Source Implementation:** Provides full implementation, including inference and fine-tuning code, for research and development.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface Spirit-AI-Team/spirit-v1.5
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
OpenAI GPT-4V
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. OpenAI GPT-4V · recommended 1×
  2. Google DeepMind RT-2 · recommended 1×
  3. Google DeepMind PaLM-E · recommended 1×
  4. Meta AI's Segment Anything Model (SAM) · recommended 1×
  5. Microsoft's Florence-2 · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best vision-language models for controlling robotic systems?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenAI GPT-4V
    2. Google DeepMind RT-2
    3. Google DeepMind PaLM-E
    4. Meta AI's Segment Anything Model (SAM)
    5. Microsoft's Florence-2
    6. LLaVA
    7. MiniGPT-4

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named Spirit-AI-Team/spirit-v1.5. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Need a robust foundation model to develop advanced robotic manipulation capabilities.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. RT-X (Robotics Transformer X)
    2. OpenAI's CLIP (Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training)
    3. Google's PaLM-E (Pathways Language Model Embodied)
    4. Meta's DINOv2 (Self-supervised Vision Transformer)
    5. Microsoft's Florence (Foundation Model for Vision and Language)
    6. Google's SayCan (Say, then Can)

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named Spirit-AI-Team/spirit-v1.5. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of Spirit-AI-Team/spirit-v1.5?
    pass
    AI named Spirit-AI-Team/spirit-v1.5 explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts Spirit-AI-Team/spirit-v1.5 in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named Spirit-AI-Team/spirit-v1.5 explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo Spirit-AI-Team/spirit-v1.5 solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named Spirit-AI-Team/spirit-v1.5 explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of Spirit-AI-Team/spirit-v1.5. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/Spirit-AI-Team/spirit-v1.5.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/Spirit-AI-Team/spirit-v1.5)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/Spirit-AI-Team/spirit-v1.5"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/Spirit-AI-Team/spirit-v1.5.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

Spirit-AI-Team/spirit-v1.5 — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite