RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

jacob-bd/notebooklm-mcp-cli

Default branch main · commit f743ade8 · scanned 5/13/2026, 1:27:18 PM

GitHub: 4,368 stars · 699 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
17 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface jacob-bd/notebooklm-mcp-cli, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Add a concise description to the 'About' section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Programmatic access to Google NotebookLM via CLI and MCP server for developers and power users.
  • mediumreadme#2
    Reposition the core value proposition in the README

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # NotebookLM CLI & MCP Server

> 🎉 **January 2026 — Major Update!** This project has been completely refactored...

**Programmatic access to Google NotebookLM** — via command-line interface (CLI) or Model Context Protocol (MCP) server.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # NotebookLM CLI & MCP Server

**Programmatic access to Google NotebookLM** — via command-line interface (CLI) or Model Context Protocol (MCP) server.

> 🎉 **January 2026 — Major Update!** This project has been completely refactored...

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface jacob-bd/notebooklm-mcp-cli
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Google Cloud Document AI
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Google Cloud Document AI · recommended 1×
  2. Amazon Textract · recommended 1×
  3. Azure Form Recognizer (now Azure AI Document Intelligence) · recommended 1×
  4. OpenAI API (specifically GPT-4 or newer models) · recommended 1×
  5. deepset-ai/haystack · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I programmatically access an AI-powered research and document analysis service?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Google Cloud Document AI
    2. Amazon Textract
    3. Azure Form Recognizer (now Azure AI Document Intelligence)
    4. OpenAI API (specifically GPT-4 or newer models)
    5. Haystack (deepset.ai) (deepset-ai/haystack)
    6. MonkeyLearn
    7. Rosette (Basis Technology)

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named jacob-bd/notebooklm-mcp-cli. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a CLI or server to integrate with an AI knowledge base platform.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    2. LlamaIndex (run-llama/llama_index)
    3. FastAPI (tiangolo/fastapi)
    4. Gradio (gradio-app/gradio)
    5. Flask (pallets/flask)
    6. Node.js (nodejs/node)
    7. Express.js (expressjs/express)
    8. Click (pallets/click)

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named jacob-bd/notebooklm-mcp-cli. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of jacob-bd/notebooklm-mcp-cli?
    pass
    AI did not name jacob-bd/notebooklm-mcp-cli — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts jacob-bd/notebooklm-mcp-cli in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named jacob-bd/notebooklm-mcp-cli explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo jacob-bd/notebooklm-mcp-cli solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name jacob-bd/notebooklm-mcp-cli — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of jacob-bd/notebooklm-mcp-cli. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/jacob-bd/notebooklm-mcp-cli.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/jacob-bd/notebooklm-mcp-cli)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/jacob-bd/notebooklm-mcp-cli"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/jacob-bd/notebooklm-mcp-cli.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

jacob-bd/notebooklm-mcp-cli — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite
jacob-bd/notebooklm-mcp-cli — RepoGEO report