RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

sturdy-dev/codereview.gpt

Default branch main · commit 84f8b36c · scanned 6/4/2026, 10:32:56 AM

GitHub: 608 stars · 77 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface sturdy-dev/codereview.gpt, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README H1 and opening paragraph to highlight 'Chrome extension' for PR/MR reviews

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # codereview.gpt

<p align='center'>
    Review GitHub Pull Requests or GitLab Merge Requests using <a href="https://chat.openai.com" target="_blank">ChatGPT</a>.
</p>
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # codereview.gpt: A Chrome Extension for AI-Powered Pull/Merge Request Reviews

<p align='center'>
    This Chrome extension allows you to review GitHub Pull Requests or GitLab Merge Requests using <a href="https://chat.openai.com" target="_blank">ChatGPT</a>.
</p>
  • highhomepage#2
    Add the Chrome Web Store URL as the repository homepage

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/codereviewgpt/amdfidcajdihmbhmmgohhkoaijpkocdn
  • mediumtopics#3
    Add more specific topics related to code review and pull requests

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ai, chatgpt, chrome-extension, github, gitlab
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai, chatgpt, chrome-extension, github, gitlab, code-review, pull-request, merge-request

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface sturdy-dev/codereview.gpt
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
GitHub Copilot Enterprise
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. GitHub Copilot Enterprise · recommended 1×
  2. CodeRabbit · recommended 1×
  3. DeepSource · recommended 1×
  4. Codiga · recommended 1×
  5. SonarQube · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for an AI assistant or tool to provide automated code review comments on pull requests.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Copilot Enterprise
    2. CodeRabbit
    3. DeepSource
    4. Codiga
    5. SonarQube
    6. CodeClimate
    7. LGTM

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named sturdy-dev/codereview.gpt. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best browser extensions for getting AI-powered feedback on my code changes?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Copilot
    2. Codeium
    3. Tabnine
    4. Mutable.ai
    5. Blackbox AI

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named sturdy-dev/codereview.gpt. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of sturdy-dev/codereview.gpt?
    pass
    AI did not name sturdy-dev/codereview.gpt — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts sturdy-dev/codereview.gpt in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named sturdy-dev/codereview.gpt explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo sturdy-dev/codereview.gpt solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named sturdy-dev/codereview.gpt explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of sturdy-dev/codereview.gpt. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/sturdy-dev/codereview.gpt.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/sturdy-dev/codereview.gpt)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/sturdy-dev/codereview.gpt"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/sturdy-dev/codereview.gpt.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

sturdy-dev/codereview.gpt — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite