RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

Clouditera/Clouditera.github.io

Default branch gh-pages · commit 9ee16cd0 · scanned 6/6/2026, 3:23:06 PM

GitHub: 634 stars · 48 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
33 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface Clouditera/Clouditera.github.io, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Reposition the repository description to explicitly state it's a knowledge base

    Why:

    CURRENT
    塑造未来的安全领域智能革命
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    GPTSecurity: 专注于未来安全领域智能革命的知识库，涵盖GPT、AIGC、LLM在安全领域的应用。
  • mediumtopics#2
    Expand topics to include more specific cybersecurity and AI terms

    Why:

    CURRENT
    aigc, gpt-4, security, wiki
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    aigc, gpt-4, security, wiki, cybersecurity, llm, generative-ai, software-supply-chain-security, threat-detection, knowledge-base
  • mediumreadme#3
    Add a FAQ section to the README to clarify the project's nature

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## 常见问题 (FAQ)

**Q: GPTSecurity 是一个公司网站吗？**
A: 不，GPTSecurity 是一个开放的、社区驱动的知识库，专注于 GPT、AIGC 和 LLM 在安全领域的应用。它旨在汇集前沿研究、实践经验、实用工具和预设指令，供安全领域的从业者、研究者和开发者交流与协作。

**Q: 我如何为 GPTSecurity 贡献内容？**
A: 我们欢迎通过 GitHub Issues 或 Pull Requests 提交贡献。请参阅上方的“贡献指南”了解详细流程。

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface Clouditera/Clouditera.github.io
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
MITRE ATT&CK Framework
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. MITRE ATT&CK Framework · recommended 1×
  2. OWASP Top 10 · recommended 1×
  3. NIST Special Publication 800-213 · recommended 1×
  4. Hugging Face Hub · recommended 1×
  5. Papers With Code · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a knowledge base for AI and large language model applications in cybersecurity.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. MITRE ATT&CK Framework
    2. OWASP Top 10
    3. NIST Special Publication 800-213
    4. Hugging Face Hub
    5. Papers With Code
    6. SANS Institute Reading Room
    7. OpenAI API Documentation & Cookbook

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named Clouditera/Clouditera.github.io. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to apply generative AI and LLMs for enhancing software supply chain security?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenAI GPT-4 / GPT-3.5 Turbo
    2. Google Cloud Vertex AI
    3. Hugging Face Transformers (huggingface/transformers)
    4. GitHub Copilot
    5. Snyk Code
    6. OWASP LLM Security Project (OWASP/llm-security)

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named Clouditera/Clouditera.github.io. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of Clouditera/Clouditera.github.io?
    pass
    AI named Clouditera/Clouditera.github.io explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts Clouditera/Clouditera.github.io in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named Clouditera/Clouditera.github.io explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo Clouditera/Clouditera.github.io solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name Clouditera/Clouditera.github.io — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of Clouditera/Clouditera.github.io. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/Clouditera/Clouditera.github.io.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/Clouditera/Clouditera.github.io)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/Clouditera/Clouditera.github.io"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/Clouditera/Clouditera.github.io.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

Clouditera/Clouditera.github.io — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite
Clouditera/Clouditera.github.io — RepoGEO report