REPOGEO REPORT · LITE
supermemoryai/opensearch-ai
Default branch main · commit 3d8c34a9 · scanned 5/11/2026, 5:07:57 PM
GitHub: 1,320 stars · 201 forks
Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface supermemoryai/opensearch-ai, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.
Action plan — copy-paste fixes
2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.
- highlicense#1Add a LICENSE file to the repository
Why:
CURRENT(no LICENSE file detected — the repo has no recognizable license)
COPY-PASTE FIX(Choose and add a standard open-source license file, e.g., MIT, Apache-2.0, GPL-3.0, to the repository root.)
- highreadme#2Reposition the README H1 to explicitly state the project's purpose
Why:
CURRENT## OpenSearch GPT
COPY-PASTE FIX## OpenSearch GPT: A Personalized AI Search Engine
Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash
Category visibility — the real GEO test
Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?
Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.
- Elasticsearch · recommended 2×
- Apache Flink · recommended 1×
- Apache Kafka · recommended 1×
- Scikit-learn · recommended 1×
- TensorFlow · recommended 1×
- CATEGORY QUERYHow to build a personalized AI search engine that learns user interests?you: not recommendedAI recommended (in order):
- Elasticsearch
- Apache Flink
- Apache Kafka
- Scikit-learn
- TensorFlow
- PyTorch
- Faiss
- Hnswlib
- Jupyter Notebooks
- Google Colab
- Apache Cassandra
- MongoDB
AI recommended 12 alternatives but never named supermemoryai/opensearch-ai. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer
- CATEGORY QUERYWhat frameworks enable creating a custom AI search application with memory features?you: not recommendedAI recommended (in order):
- LangChain
- LlamaIndex
- Haystack
- Rasa
- OpenAI API
- Anthropic's Claude
- Pinecone
- Weaviate
- Qdrant
- Elasticsearch
AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named supermemoryai/opensearch-ai. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer
Objective checks
Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.
- Metadata completenesswarn
Suggestion:
- README presencepass
Self-mention check
Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?
- Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of supermemoryai/opensearch-ai?passAI named supermemoryai/opensearch-ai explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
- If a team adopts supermemoryai/opensearch-ai in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?passAI named supermemoryai/opensearch-ai explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
- In one sentence, what problem does the repo supermemoryai/opensearch-ai solve, and who is the primary audience?passAI named supermemoryai/opensearch-ai explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
Embed your GEO score
Drop this badge into the README of supermemoryai/opensearch-ai. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.
[](https://repogeo.com/en/r/supermemoryai/opensearch-ai)<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/supermemoryai/opensearch-ai"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/supermemoryai/opensearch-ai.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses
supermemoryai/opensearch-ai — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.
- Deep reports10 / month
- Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
- Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite