RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

beyondcode/writeout.ai

Default branch main · commit e9a5b58f · scanned 5/29/2026, 12:48:02 AM

GitHub: 1,528 stars · 162 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
22 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface beyondcode/writeout.ai, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README H1 and opening sentence to clarify it's a self-hosted web app

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # writeout.ai

Transcribe and translate audio files using OpenAI's Whisper API.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # writeout.ai: Self-Hosted AI Audio Transcription & Translation Web App

Writeout.ai is a free, open-source web application that allows you to easily transcribe and translate audio files using OpenAI's Whisper API, deployable on your own server.
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    audio-transcription, audio-translation, openai-whisper, whisper-api, laravel, php, self-hosted, web-application, free, open-source
  • mediumreadme#3
    Add a sentence to README clarifying differentiation from commercial services and raw APIs

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add this sentence after the initial description: "Unlike commercial transcription services or direct API integrations, Writeout.ai provides a complete, self-hosted web interface for managing your audio transcription and translation tasks."

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface beyondcode/writeout.ai
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Happy Scribe
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Happy Scribe · recommended 1×
  2. Trint · recommended 1×
  3. Rev · recommended 1×
  4. Otter.ai · recommended 1×
  5. Google Cloud Speech-to-Text · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are good tools for transcribing audio files and translating them into text?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Happy Scribe
    2. Trint
    3. Rev
    4. Otter.ai
    5. Google Cloud Speech-to-Text
    6. Google Cloud Translation
    7. AWS Transcribe
    8. AWS Translate
    9. DeepL

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named beyondcode/writeout.ai. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a free, open-source solution to transcribe and translate audio using AI.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Whisper
    2. Vosk
    3. Mozilla DeepSpeech
    4. Hugging Face Transformers
    5. MarianMT
    6. Opus-MT
    7. Coqui STT

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named beyondcode/writeout.ai. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of beyondcode/writeout.ai?
    pass
    AI did not name beyondcode/writeout.ai — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts beyondcode/writeout.ai in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named beyondcode/writeout.ai explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo beyondcode/writeout.ai solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name beyondcode/writeout.ai — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of beyondcode/writeout.ai. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/beyondcode/writeout.ai.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/beyondcode/writeout.ai)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/beyondcode/writeout.ai"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/beyondcode/writeout.ai.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

beyondcode/writeout.ai — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite