RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

microsoft/LLMLingua

Default branch main · commit e0e9d99b · scanned 5/16/2026, 6:06:27 AM

GitHub: 6,191 stars · 383 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
69 /100
Needs work
Category recall
1 / 2
Avg rank #1.0 when recommended
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface microsoft/LLMLingua, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    llm, large-language-models, prompt-compression, kv-cache, inference-optimization, llm-inference, machine-learning, nlp, deep-learning
  • highreadme#2
    Update README H2 to explicitly include KV-cache optimization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    <h2 align="center">LLMLingua Series | Effectively Deliver Information to LLMs via Prompt Compression</h2>
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    <h2 align="center">LLMLingua Series | Prompt and KV-Cache Compression for Efficient LLM Inference</h2>
  • mediumreadme#3
    Add a concise opening paragraph to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    LLMLingua is a series of techniques designed to speed up Large Language Model (LLM) inference and enhance their perception of key information by effectively compressing both input prompts and KV-Cache. This approach achieves up to 20x compression with minimal performance loss.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
1 / 2
50% of queries surface microsoft/LLMLingua
Avg rank
#1.0
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
6%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LongLLMLingua
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LongLLMLingua · recommended 1×
  2. LlamaIndex · recommended 1×
  3. LangChain · recommended 1×
  4. Cohere Rerank · recommended 1×
  5. BGE Reranker · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to reduce LLM inference costs by effectively compressing input prompts and context?
    you: #1
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LLMLingua ← you
    2. LongLLMLingua
    3. LlamaIndex
    4. LangChain
    5. Cohere Rerank
    6. BGE Reranker
    7. spaCy
    8. NLTK
    9. OpenAI API
    10. GPT-3.5 Turbo
    11. Mistral 7B
    12. Hugging Face Tokenizers
    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking tools to optimize KV cache and prompt processing for faster large language model responses.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. vLLM
    2. DeepSpeed-MII
    3. Triton Inference Server
    4. TensorRT-LLM
    5. llama.cpp
    6. OpenVINO

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named microsoft/LLMLingua. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of microsoft/LLMLingua?
    pass
    AI named microsoft/LLMLingua explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts microsoft/LLMLingua in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named microsoft/LLMLingua explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo microsoft/LLMLingua solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named microsoft/LLMLingua explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of microsoft/LLMLingua. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/microsoft/LLMLingua.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/microsoft/LLMLingua)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/microsoft/LLMLingua"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/microsoft/LLMLingua.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

microsoft/LLMLingua — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite
microsoft/LLMLingua — RepoGEO report