RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

X-PLUG/mPLUG-DocOwl

Default branch main · commit f91a7685 · scanned 5/15/2026, 8:38:16 AM

GitHub: 2,406 stars · 154 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface X-PLUG/mPLUG-DocOwl, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README opening to highlight specialization and open-source nature

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    X-PLUG/mPLUG-DocOwl is an open-source, specialized Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM) designed for advanced OCR-free document understanding. It excels in interpreting complex visual documents, including tables and charts, across multiple pages, offering a powerful alternative to general-purpose MLLMs and commercial document AI solutions.
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add a project homepage URL

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://[your-project-homepage-url-here]
  • lowreadme#3
    Add a 'Why mPLUG-DocOwl?' section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## Why mPLUG-DocOwl?
    
    Unlike general-purpose Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) or commercial document AI services, mPLUG-DocOwl offers a specialized, unified multimodal approach for comprehensive OCR-free document understanding. Key differentiators include:
    *   **Specialized for Complex Documents:** Optimized for intricate visual documents, including tables and charts, across multiple pages.
    *   **Efficiency:** Achieves state-of-the-art performance with highly efficient token encoding (e.g., 324 tokens per document image for DocOwl2).
    *   **Open-Source & Research-Driven:** Provides training code and models for finetuning, fostering research and custom applications.
    *   **SOTA Performance:** Demonstrated leading results on benchmarks like ChartQA (TinyChart: 83.6 > Gemini-Ultra 80.8 > GPT4V 78.5).

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface X-PLUG/mPLUG-DocOwl
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Gemini 1.5 Pro
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Gemini 1.5 Pro · recommended 2×
  2. GPT-4o · recommended 1×
  3. Claude 3 Opus/Sonnet · recommended 1×
  4. LLaVA-Med/LLaVA · recommended 1×
  5. Fuyu-8B · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best multimodal large language models for OCR-free document understanding?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GPT-4o
    2. Gemini 1.5 Pro
    3. Claude 3 Opus/Sonnet
    4. LLaVA (Large Language and Vision Assistant) (LLaVA-Med/LLaVA)
    5. Fuyu-8B
    6. Donut (Document Understanding Transformer) (naver-ai/donut)

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named X-PLUG/mPLUG-DocOwl. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I extract information from tables and charts in multipage documents using AI?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Google Cloud Document AI
    2. Azure AI Document Intelligence
    3. Amazon Textract
    4. OpenAI GPT-4V (Vision)
    5. LLaVA
    6. Gemini 1.5 Pro
    7. LayoutParser
    8. Tesseract OCR
    9. PaddleOCR
    10. Pandas
    11. camelot-py
    12. tabula-py
    13. Nanonets
    14. Rossum

    AI recommended 14 alternatives but never named X-PLUG/mPLUG-DocOwl. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of X-PLUG/mPLUG-DocOwl?
    pass
    AI named X-PLUG/mPLUG-DocOwl explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts X-PLUG/mPLUG-DocOwl in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named X-PLUG/mPLUG-DocOwl explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo X-PLUG/mPLUG-DocOwl solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named X-PLUG/mPLUG-DocOwl explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of X-PLUG/mPLUG-DocOwl. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/X-PLUG/mPLUG-DocOwl.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/X-PLUG/mPLUG-DocOwl)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/X-PLUG/mPLUG-DocOwl"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/X-PLUG/mPLUG-DocOwl.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

X-PLUG/mPLUG-DocOwl — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite