RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

trevin-creator/autoresearch-mlx

Default branch main · commit ba6ebf6d · scanned 5/12/2026, 8:43:04 PM

GitHub: 1,566 stars · 321 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface trevin-creator/autoresearch-mlx, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Add explicit category statement to README introduction

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Apple Silicon (MLX) port of Karpathy's autoresearch.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Apple Silicon (MLX) port of Karpathy's autoresearch.

This project is an autonomous AI research agent, designed to run self-improving deep learning experiments locally on Apple Silicon using MLX.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add relevant topics for categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-agent, autonomous-ai, mlx, apple-silicon, deep-learning, research-automation, karpathy, machine-learning
  • lowhomepage#3
    Set repository URL as homepage

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/trevin-creator/autoresearch-mlx

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface trevin-creator/autoresearch-mlx
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Weights & Biases
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Weights & Biases · recommended 1×
  2. MLflow · recommended 1×
  3. Optuna · recommended 1×
  4. Hyperopt · recommended 1×
  5. Ray Tune · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I automate AI model experimentation and hyperparameter tuning on my Mac?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Weights & Biases
    2. MLflow
    3. Optuna
    4. Hyperopt
    5. Ray Tune
    6. Scikit-learn's GridSearchCV/RandomizedSearchCV

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named trevin-creator/autoresearch-mlx. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a framework for autonomous deep learning experiments on Apple Silicon without PyTorch.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. TensorFlow (tensorflow/tensorflow)
    2. tensorflow-metal (apple/tensorflow_metal)
    3. ML Compute
    4. JAX (google/jax)
    5. XLA
    6. Keras (keras-team/keras)
    7. MXNet (apache/mxnet)
    8. Core ML Tools (apple/coremltools)

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named trevin-creator/autoresearch-mlx. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of trevin-creator/autoresearch-mlx?
    pass
    AI named trevin-creator/autoresearch-mlx explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts trevin-creator/autoresearch-mlx in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named trevin-creator/autoresearch-mlx explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo trevin-creator/autoresearch-mlx solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name trevin-creator/autoresearch-mlx — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of trevin-creator/autoresearch-mlx. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/trevin-creator/autoresearch-mlx.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/trevin-creator/autoresearch-mlx)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/trevin-creator/autoresearch-mlx"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/trevin-creator/autoresearch-mlx.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

trevin-creator/autoresearch-mlx — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite