RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

Paitesanshi/LLM-Agent-Survey

Default branch main · commit c6503602 · scanned 5/16/2026, 2:13:39 PM

GitHub: 2,902 stars · 159 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
17 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface Paitesanshi/LLM-Agent-Survey, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Add a concise repository description

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A comprehensive survey paper and curated list of resources on LLM-based autonomous agents, covering construction, applications, and evaluation strategies.
  • highlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file in the repository root with the text of a standard open-source license, such as the MIT License.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface Paitesanshi/LLM-Agent-Survey
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LangChain
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LangChain · recommended 1×
  2. LlamaIndex · recommended 1×
  3. OpenAI API · recommended 1×
  4. Anthropic Claude · recommended 1×
  5. Google Gemini · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the essential components and applications for building LLM-based autonomous agents?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. OpenAI API
    4. Anthropic Claude
    5. Google Gemini
    6. Pinecone
    7. Weaviate
    8. Chroma
    9. Qdrant
    10. Faiss
    11. Docker
    12. Kubernetes
    13. Streamlit
    14. Gradio

    AI recommended 14 alternatives but never named Paitesanshi/LLM-Agent-Survey. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Where can I find a survey on evaluation strategies for large language model autonomous agents?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. arXiv.org
    2. Google Scholar
    3. Papers With Code
    4. NeurIPS
    5. ICML
    6. ICLR
    7. ACL
    8. EMNLP
    9. AAAI
    10. KDD
    11. ACL Anthology
    12. OpenReview
    13. Hugging Face
    14. Towards Data Science
    15. Medium

    AI recommended 15 alternatives but never named Paitesanshi/LLM-Agent-Survey. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of Paitesanshi/LLM-Agent-Survey?
    pass
    AI did not name Paitesanshi/LLM-Agent-Survey — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts Paitesanshi/LLM-Agent-Survey in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named Paitesanshi/LLM-Agent-Survey explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo Paitesanshi/LLM-Agent-Survey solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name Paitesanshi/LLM-Agent-Survey — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of Paitesanshi/LLM-Agent-Survey. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/Paitesanshi/LLM-Agent-Survey.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/Paitesanshi/LLM-Agent-Survey)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/Paitesanshi/LLM-Agent-Survey"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/Paitesanshi/LLM-Agent-Survey.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

Paitesanshi/LLM-Agent-Survey — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite