RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

NoopApp/noop

Default branch main · commit a3f5e39e · scanned 6/14/2026, 7:51:34 PM

GitHub: 1,638 stars · 713 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface NoopApp/noop, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README H1 and tagline to explicitly state the WHOOP connection

    Why:

    CURRENT
    <h1 align="center">NOOP</h1>
<p align="center"><b>Your strap. Your data. Your machine. Local-first, no cloud.</b></p>
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    <h1 align="center">NOOP: Offline WHOOP Companion</h1>
<p align="center"><b>Pair your WHOOP strap over Bluetooth, keep all data on your own device. No cloud, no account, no subscription.</b></p>
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    whoop, fitness-tracker, bluetooth, privacy, local-first, health, wearable, biometric-data, no-cloud, open-source
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository settings

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    [Insert project's official website or primary landing page URL here]

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface NoopApp/noop
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Garmin Forerunner Series
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Garmin Forerunner Series · recommended 1×
  2. Garmin Express · recommended 1×
  3. Polar Vantage Series · recommended 1×
  4. Polar FlowSync · recommended 1×
  5. Wahoo ELEMNT GPS Bike Computers · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I keep my wearable fitness tracker data completely local, avoiding cloud services and subscriptions?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Garmin Forerunner Series
    2. Garmin Express
    3. Polar Vantage Series
    4. Polar FlowSync
    5. Wahoo ELEMNT GPS Bike Computers
    6. Fitbit models
    7. ESP32
    8. GoldenCheetah
    9. Runalyze
    10. Python
    11. R Scripts
    12. fitparse

    AI recommended 12 alternatives but never named NoopApp/noop. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a privacy-centric application to capture biometric data directly from a fitness band via Bluetooth.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Gadgetbridge (Freeyourgadget/Gadgetbridge)
    2. Notify & Fitness for Amazfit/Mi Band
    3. OpenTracks (OpenTracksApp/OpenTracks)
    4. nRF Connect for Mobile
    5. Bleak (hbldh/bleak)
    6. RxAndroidBle (Polidea/RxAndroidBle)

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named NoopApp/noop. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of NoopApp/noop?
    pass
    AI named NoopApp/noop explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts NoopApp/noop in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named NoopApp/noop explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo NoopApp/noop solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named NoopApp/noop explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of NoopApp/noop. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/NoopApp/noop.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/NoopApp/noop)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/NoopApp/noop"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/NoopApp/noop.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

NoopApp/noop — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite