RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

rednote-hilab/dots.ocr

Default branch master · commit 36d72488 · scanned 5/16/2026, 3:47:32 AM

GitHub: 8,625 stars · 770 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface rednote-hilab/dots.ocr, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Clarify project's core function in README introduction

    Why:

    CURRENT
    **dots.ocr** Designed for universal accessibility, it possesses the capability to recognize virtually any human script. Beyond achieving state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance in standard multilingual document parsing among models of comparable size, dots.ocr-1.5 excels at converting structured graphics (e.g., charts and diagrams) directly into SVG code, parsing web screens and spotting scene text.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    dots.ocr is a state-of-the-art Vision-Language Model for multilingual document layout parsing, text extraction, and converting structured graphics (like charts and diagrams) directly into SVG code. It is NOT for Braille OCR.
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Set the repository homepage URL

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://dotsocr.xiaohongshu.com

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface rednote-hilab/dots.ocr
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LayoutLMv3
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LayoutLMv3 · recommended 1×
  2. Donut · recommended 1×
  3. PaddleOCR · recommended 1×
  4. Tesseract OCR · recommended 1×
  5. DocILE · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What open-source models effectively parse document layouts and extract text from diverse languages?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LayoutLMv3
    2. Donut
    3. PaddleOCR
    4. Tesseract OCR
    5. DocILE

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named rednote-hilab/dots.ocr. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to convert complex document graphics and diagrams into editable SVG format programmatically?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Adobe Illustrator
    2. Inkscape
    3. Potrace
    4. ImageMagick
    5. OpenCV (opencv/opencv)
    6. Apache Batik
    7. PDF.js (mozilla/pdf.js)
    8. Aspose.SVG
    9. CloudConvert API

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named rednote-hilab/dots.ocr. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of rednote-hilab/dots.ocr?
    pass
    AI did not name rednote-hilab/dots.ocr — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts rednote-hilab/dots.ocr in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named rednote-hilab/dots.ocr explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo rednote-hilab/dots.ocr solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named rednote-hilab/dots.ocr explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of rednote-hilab/dots.ocr. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/rednote-hilab/dots.ocr.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/rednote-hilab/dots.ocr)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/rednote-hilab/dots.ocr"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/rednote-hilab/dots.ocr.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

rednote-hilab/dots.ocr — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite