RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

THUDM/P-tuning-v2

Default branch main · commit b1520c9a · scanned 5/10/2026, 9:07:40 PM

GitHub: 2,075 stars · 208 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface THUDM/P-tuning-v2, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the core differentiator to the README's opening

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The README currently starts with paper links, followed by a general description, and then explains 'deep prompt tuning' later.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    P-tuning v2 introduces **deep prompt tuning**, applying continuous prompts to every layer input of a pretrained transformer to achieve fine-tuning comparable performance across scales and tasks.
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/THUDM/P-tuning-v2
  • lowtopics#3
    Add 'deep-prompt-tuning' to repository topics

    Why:

    CURRENT
    natural-language-processing, p-tuning, parameter-efficient-learning, pretrained-language-model, prompt-tuning
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    natural-language-processing, p-tuning, parameter-efficient-learning, pretrained-language-model, prompt-tuning, deep-prompt-tuning

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface THUDM/P-tuning-v2
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LoRA
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LoRA · recommended 2×
  2. Houlsby Adapters · recommended 2×
  3. QLoRA · recommended 1×
  4. Prompt Tuning · recommended 1×
  5. Prefix Tuning · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to achieve fine-tuning performance on large language models without full fine-tuning?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LoRA
    2. QLoRA
    3. Prompt Tuning
    4. Prefix Tuning
    5. P-Tuning v2
    6. Houlsby Adapters
    7. Compacter
    8. In-Context Learning

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named THUDM/P-tuning-v2. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking parameter-efficient methods to achieve fine-tuning level performance for sequence tagging tasks.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LoRA
    2. Hugging Face PEFT
    3. Prefix-Tuning
    4. Prompt-Tuning
    5. Houlsby Adapters
    6. Pfeiffer Adapters
    7. IA3
    8. BitFit

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named THUDM/P-tuning-v2. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of THUDM/P-tuning-v2?
    pass
    AI named THUDM/P-tuning-v2 explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts THUDM/P-tuning-v2 in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named THUDM/P-tuning-v2 explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo THUDM/P-tuning-v2 solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named THUDM/P-tuning-v2 explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of THUDM/P-tuning-v2. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/THUDM/P-tuning-v2.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/THUDM/P-tuning-v2)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/THUDM/P-tuning-v2"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/THUDM/P-tuning-v2.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

THUDM/P-tuning-v2 — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite