RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

batrachianai/toad

Default branch main · commit bed254e0 · scanned 5/15/2026, 8:52:25 AM

GitHub: 3,071 stars · 146 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface batrachianai/toad, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README H1 to specify category and function

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Toad
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Toad: A Unified Terminal Interface for AI Coding Agents
  • mediumtopics#2
    Expand topics to include broader category terms

    Why:

    CURRENT
    agents-ui, ai, claude, claude-code, codex-cli, commercial-license, copilot, textual, tui
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    agents-ui, ai, claude, claude-code, codex-cli, commercial-license, copilot, textual, tui, ai-coding-assistant, terminal-ai, developer-tools, cli-tool, agentic-ai
  • lowcomparison#3
    Add a 'Comparison to Alternatives' section in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section, e.g., `## Comparison to Alternatives` or `## Why Toad?`, that directly addresses how Toad stands out from tools like Continue.dev, smol-developer, Open Interpreter, etc., focusing on its 'unified interface' and 'AI App store' aspects.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface batrachianai/toad
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
smol-ai/smol-developer
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. smol-ai/smol-developer · recommended 2×
  2. Continue.dev · recommended 1×
  3. OpenAI CLI · recommended 1×
  4. LM Studio · recommended 1×
  5. Ollama · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I interact with multiple AI coding assistants directly from my terminal?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Continue.dev
    2. smol-ai/smol-developer (smol-ai/smol-developer)
    3. OpenAI CLI
    4. LM Studio
    5. Ollama
    6. ShellGPT (SGPT)

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named batrachianai/toad. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best terminal-based tools for managing and using AI coding agents?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Cursor
    2. Continue (continue-team/continue)
    3. Open Interpreter (KillianLucas/open-interpreter)
    4. smol-developer (smol-ai/smol-developer)
    5. aider (paul-gauthier/aider)
    6. gpt-engineer (gpt-engineer-org/gpt-engineer)
    7. ShellGPT (sgpt) (TheR1D/shell_gpt)

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named batrachianai/toad. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of batrachianai/toad?
    pass
    AI named batrachianai/toad explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts batrachianai/toad in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named batrachianai/toad explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo batrachianai/toad solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named batrachianai/toad explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of batrachianai/toad. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/batrachianai/toad.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/batrachianai/toad)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/batrachianai/toad"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/batrachianai/toad.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

batrachianai/toad — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite