RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

StarsfieldAI/R1-V

Default branch main · commit e35f97e5 · scanned 5/10/2026, 1:17:06 AM

GitHub: 4,054 stars · 285 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
23 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface StarsfieldAI/R1-V, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Clarify project domain in README introduction

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # R1-V: Reinforcing Super Generalization Ability in Vision Language Models with Less Than $3
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # R1-V: Reinforcing Super Generalization Ability in Vision Language Models with Less Than $3
    
    *Note: This project focuses on Vision Language Models (VLMs) and is not related to the Starfield video game.*
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics for categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    vision-language-models, vlm, reinforcement-learning, rl, visual-reasoning, gui-agent, deep-learning, ai-agent, low-cost-ai
  • mediumlicense#3
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file in the repository root with a standard open-source license (e.g., MIT, Apache-2.0, or GPL-3.0) that aligns with the project's goals for contribution and usage.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface StarsfieldAI/R1-V
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
OpenCLIP
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. OpenCLIP · recommended 1×
  2. BLIP-2 · recommended 1×
  3. LLaVA · recommended 1×
  4. CLIP · recommended 1×
  5. OWL-ViT · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to achieve super generalization in vision language models with minimal computational cost?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenCLIP
    2. BLIP-2
    3. LLaVA
    4. CLIP
    5. OWL-ViT
    6. Segment Anything Model (SAM)

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named StarsfieldAI/R1-V. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What frameworks enable reinforcement learning for vision language models to create intelligent visual agents?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Hugging Face Transformers (huggingface/transformers)
    2. TRL (huggingface/trl)
    3. RLlib (ray-project/ray)
    4. Stable Baselines3 (DLR-RM/stable-baselines3)
    5. DeepMind's Acme (deepmind/acme)
    6. PyTorch Lightning (Lightning-AI/lightning)
    7. TorchRL (pytorch/rl)

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named StarsfieldAI/R1-V. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of StarsfieldAI/R1-V?
    pass
    AI did not name StarsfieldAI/R1-V — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts StarsfieldAI/R1-V in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named StarsfieldAI/R1-V explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo StarsfieldAI/R1-V solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named StarsfieldAI/R1-V explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of StarsfieldAI/R1-V. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/StarsfieldAI/R1-V.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/StarsfieldAI/R1-V)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/StarsfieldAI/R1-V"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/StarsfieldAI/R1-V.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

StarsfieldAI/R1-V — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite
StarsfieldAI/R1-V — RepoGEO report