RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

browser-use/browser-harness

Default branch main · commit 0e679e2c · scanned 5/9/2026, 7:52:11 AM

GitHub: 11,751 stars · 1,064 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface browser-use/browser-harness, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Strengthen README opening to emphasize AI agent and self-healing

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Connect an LLM directly to your real browser with a thin, editable CDP harness. For browser tasks where you need **complete freedom**.

One websocket to Chrome, nothing between. The agent writes what's missing during execution. The harness improves itself every run.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Connect your LLM directly to a real browser with Browser Harness, a self-healing CDP harness designed for AI agents to complete any task with **complete freedom**. It's not just browser automation; it's an intelligent, adaptive interface where the agent writes missing code and the harness improves itself every run.
  • mediumreadme#2
    Add a 'Why Browser Harness?' or 'Comparison' section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## Why Browser Harness? (vs. Playwright, Selenium, Puppeteer)

Unlike traditional browser automation frameworks, Browser Harness is built from the ground up for AI agents. It offers a direct, thin CDP interface, enabling self-healing capabilities where your agent can write missing code during execution. This provides unparalleled freedom and adaptability for complex, dynamic tasks that go beyond scripted test flows.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface browser-use/browser-harness
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Playwright
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Playwright · recommended 1×
  2. Selenium WebDriver · recommended 1×
  3. Puppeteer · recommended 1×
  4. Cypress · recommended 1×
  5. Robot Framework · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I connect an AI agent to a real browser for complex tasks?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Playwright
    2. Selenium WebDriver
    3. Puppeteer
    4. Cypress
    5. Robot Framework
    6. Pyppeteer
    7. Splash

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named browser-use/browser-harness. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a self-healing browser automation tool for AI agent workflows.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Playwright (microsoft/playwright)
    2. Cypress (cypress-io/cypress)
    3. Testim.io
    4. Applitools Ultrafast Test Cloud
    5. Selenium (SeleniumHQ/selenium)
    6. OpenCV (opencv/opencv)
    7. Leapwork

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named browser-use/browser-harness. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of browser-use/browser-harness?
    pass
    AI named browser-use/browser-harness explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts browser-use/browser-harness in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named browser-use/browser-harness explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo browser-use/browser-harness solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named browser-use/browser-harness explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of browser-use/browser-harness. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/browser-use/browser-harness.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/browser-use/browser-harness)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/browser-use/browser-harness"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/browser-use/browser-harness.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

browser-use/browser-harness — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite