RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

Expensify/App

Default branch main · commit be8591c9 · scanned 6/23/2026, 9:37:30 AM

GitHub: 4,917 stars · 3,910 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface Expensify/App, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening to clearly state the app's purpose

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The current README starts with a large centered logo and then jumps into a Table of Contents and local development instructions.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Move the existing 'Welcome to New Expensify: a complete re-imagination of financial collaboration, centered around chat. Help us build the next generation of Expensify by sharing feedback and contributing to the code.' from the repository description to the very top of the README, right after the main heading, to immediately clarify the project's purpose.
  • mediumreadme#2
    Emphasize 'expense management' and 'financial collaboration' in the README's introduction

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The README excerpt focuses on development, not the specific financial and chat features.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a short paragraph after the initial repositioned description, explicitly highlighting key features like 'real-time expense reporting,' 'reimbursement,' and 'AI-powered SmartScan' to differentiate it from generic chat or framework projects.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface Expensify/App
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
mattermost/mattermost-server
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. mattermost/mattermost-server · recommended 1×
  2. RocketChat/Rocket.Chat · recommended 1×
  3. igniterealtime/Openfire · recommended 1×
  4. esl/MongooseIM · recommended 1×
  5. nextcloud/spreed · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What open source tools exist for building chat-centric financial collaboration platforms?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Mattermost (mattermost/mattermost-server)
    2. Rocket.Chat (RocketChat/Rocket.Chat)
    3. Openfire (igniterealtime/Openfire)
    4. MongooseIM (esl/MongooseIM)
    5. Nextcloud Talk (nextcloud/spreed)
    6. Jitsi Meet (jitsi/jitsi-meet)

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named Expensify/App. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to build a cross-platform mobile and web app for expense management using modern JavaScript?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. React Native
    2. Expo
    3. React
    4. Next.js
    5. Flutter
    6. Dart
    7. Ionic
    8. Capacitor
    9. Cordova
    10. Angular
    11. Vue
    12. NativeScript
    13. Svelte
    14. Electron

    AI recommended 14 alternatives but never named Expensify/App. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of Expensify/App?
    pass
    AI named Expensify/App explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts Expensify/App in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named Expensify/App explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo Expensify/App solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named Expensify/App explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of Expensify/App. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/Expensify/App.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/Expensify/App)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/Expensify/App"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/Expensify/App.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

Expensify/App — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite