RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

Expensify/App

Default branch main · commit 5b44e821 · scanned 5/13/2026, 12:52:18 AM

GitHub: 4,849 stars · 3,777 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface Expensify/App, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add relevant topics for categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    react-native, finance, chat, collaboration, expense-management, financial-tech, open-source-app
  • highreadme#2
    Add a clear, concise introductory paragraph to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    New Expensify is a complete, open-source financial collaboration application built with React Native, centered around real-time chat. It streamlines expenses, payments, and team communication, inviting contributions to build the next generation of financial management.
  • mediumreadme#3
    Clarify the relationship between the open-source repository and the commercial product

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    This repository contains the full source code for the New Expensify application, which powers the commercial product available at https://new.expensify.com. While this is the core application, deploying it in production requires understanding additional infrastructure and services beyond this repository.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface Expensify/App
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Rocket.Chat
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Rocket.Chat · recommended 1×
  2. Mattermost · recommended 1×
  3. Openfire · recommended 1×
  4. XMPP · recommended 1×
  5. Smack · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What open source tools exist for building real-time financial chat applications?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Rocket.Chat
    2. Mattermost
    3. Openfire
    4. XMPP
    5. Smack
    6. Strophe.js
    7. Ejabberd
    8. Apache Kafka
    9. Socket.IO
    10. Node.js

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named Expensify/App. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I contribute to a large-scale React Native application for finance?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. TypeScript
    2. React Navigation
    3. Redux Toolkit
    4. Redux Persist
    5. Formik
    6. Yup
    7. Jest
    8. React Native Testing Library
    9. Axios
    10. NativeBase
    11. React Native Paper

    AI recommended 11 alternatives but never named Expensify/App. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of Expensify/App?
    pass
    AI named Expensify/App explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts Expensify/App in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named Expensify/App explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo Expensify/App solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named Expensify/App explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of Expensify/App. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/Expensify/App.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/Expensify/App)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/Expensify/App"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/Expensify/App.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

Expensify/App — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite