REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

Imbad0202/academic-research-skills

Default branch main · commit 17c518b2 · scanned 6/29/2026, 12:01:22 AM

GitHub: 35,040 stars · 2,884 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE

27 /100

Critical

Category recall

0 / 2

Not recommended in any query

Rule findings

2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail

Objective metadata checks

AI knows your name

1 / 3

Direct prompts that named your repo

HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION

highreadme#1

Reposition README opening to emphasize it's a Claude Code plugin/tool

Why:

CURRENT

A comprehensive suite of Claude Code skills for academic research, covering the full pipeline from research to publication.

COPY-PASTE FIX

A comprehensive Claude Code plugin providing AI-powered skills for academic research, covering the full pipeline from research to publication.

mediumtopics#2

Add more specific topics to clarify the repo's nature as a plugin/tool

Why:

CURRENT

academic-pipeline, academic-writing, ai-research, claude, claude-code, literature-review, peer-review, prompt-engineering

COPY-PASTE FIX

academic-pipeline, academic-writing, ai-research, claude, claude-code, literature-review, peer-review, prompt-engineering, claude-plugin, ai-assistant, research-tool

lowreadme#3

Add a section to the README clarifying the project's license

Why:

COPY-PASTE FIX

## License

This project is licensed under [Your Specific License Name(s) and details, e.g., a combination of CC BY-NC 4.0 and MIT]. Please refer to the LICENSE file for complete terms and conditions.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall

0 / 2

0% of queries surface Imbad0202/academic-research-skills

Avg rank

—

Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.

Share of voice

Of all named tools, what % are you?

Top rival

Elicit

Recommended in 2 of 2 queries

COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD

Elicit · recommended 2×
Scite.ai · recommended 2×
Connected Papers · recommended 2×
QuillBot · recommended 2×
ChatGPT · recommended 1×

CATEGORY QUERY
How can AI tools assist with the entire academic research and writing process?
you: not recommended
AI recommended (in order):
1. Elicit
2. Scite.ai
3. Connected Papers
4. ChatGPT
5. GPT-4 via OpenAI API
6. QuillBot
7. Grammarly
8. Zotero
9. Zotero Connector
AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named Imbad0202/academic-research-skills. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer
CATEGORY QUERY
What AI assistants help with literature review, citation, and logical consistency checks in academic papers?
you: not recommended
AI recommended (in order):
1. Elicit
2. Scite.ai
3. Connected Papers
4. Semantic Scholar
5. ChatGPT / GPT-4
6. QuillBot
AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named Imbad0202/academic-research-skills. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

Metadata completeness
pass
README presence
pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of Imbad0202/academic-research-skills?
pass
AI did not name Imbad0202/academic-research-skills — likely talking about a different project
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
If a team adopts Imbad0202/academic-research-skills in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
pass
AI named Imbad0202/academic-research-skills explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
In one sentence, what problem does the repo Imbad0202/academic-research-skills solve, and who is the primary audience?
pass
AI did not name Imbad0202/academic-research-skills — likely talking about a different project
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of Imbad0202/academic-research-skills. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

Live preview

MARKDOWN (README)

[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/Imbad0202/academic-research-skills.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/Imbad0202/academic-research-skills)

HTML

<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/Imbad0202/academic-research-skills"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/Imbad0202/academic-research-skills.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>

Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

Imbad0202/academic-research-skills — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

Deep reports10 / month
Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite