RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

Imbad0202/academic-research-skills

Default branch main · commit e8020082 · scanned 5/17/2026, 7:06:26 PM

GitHub: 9,220 stars · 1,023 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
27 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Clarify README opening to emphasize 'Claude Code plugin'

    Why:

    CURRENT
    A comprehensive suite of Claude Code skills for academic research, covering the full pipeline from research to publication.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    This repository provides a comprehensive suite of **Claude Code plugins and skills** designed to **automate and enhance** the full academic research pipeline, from initial research to final publication.
  • mediumlicense#2
    Clarify the existing license in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a section to the README (e.g., under 'License') explicitly stating the terms of use, referencing the existing LICENSE file, and clarifying which specific license(s) apply (e.g., 'This project is licensed under [License Name/Terms] as detailed in the LICENSE file.').
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a dedicated project homepage or demo link

    Why:

    CURRENT
    https://buymeacoffee.com/crucify020v
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Consider creating a dedicated project page, a demo video, or a detailed documentation site to link as the homepage. If not possible, link directly to the most relevant section of the README (e.g., installation or examples) to serve as a functional homepage.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Elicit
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Elicit · recommended 2×
  2. Scite.ai · recommended 2×
  3. QuillBot · recommended 2×
  4. ChatGPT (with GPT-4) · recommended 1×
  5. Grammarly Premium · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What AI-powered tools can assist with the full academic research and writing pipeline?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Elicit
    2. Scite.ai
    3. ChatGPT (with GPT-4)
    4. QuillBot
    5. Grammarly Premium
    6. ResearchRabbit
    7. Humata AI

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named Imbad0202/academic-research-skills. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking AI assistant to help with academic literature reviews, citations, and paper revision.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Elicit
    2. Scite.ai
    3. ChatGPT
    4. Semantic Scholar
    5. QuillBot
    6. Mendeley
    7. Zotero

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named Imbad0202/academic-research-skills. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of Imbad0202/academic-research-skills?
    pass
    AI named Imbad0202/academic-research-skills explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts Imbad0202/academic-research-skills in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI did not name Imbad0202/academic-research-skills — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo Imbad0202/academic-research-skills solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name Imbad0202/academic-research-skills — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of Imbad0202/academic-research-skills. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/Imbad0202/academic-research-skills.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/Imbad0202/academic-research-skills)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/Imbad0202/academic-research-skills"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/Imbad0202/academic-research-skills.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

Imbad0202/academic-research-skills — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite