RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

Norman-bury/research-writing-skill

Default branch main · commit 6f795955 · scanned 6/21/2026, 12:52:50 AM

GitHub: 2,437 stars · 163 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
22 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface Norman-bury/research-writing-skill, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add specific topics to categorize the repo

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-assistant, research-writing, academic-writing, llm-plugin, latex, literature-review, scientific-writing
  • highreadme#2
    Reposition the README's opening paragraph to clarify its identity

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # 科研写作助手 (Research Writing Assistant)
    > 📄 English version: [README_EN.md](README_EN.md)
    把"论文写作"从一次性聊天,升级成可追踪、可恢复、可复用的工程化协作流程。
    这个 Skill 面向本科生、研究生和早期科研人员,目标很直接:少走弯路,减少返工,把时间花在真正有价值的研究内容上。
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # 科研写作助手 (Research Writing Assistant)
    > 📄 English version: [README_EN.md](README_EN.md)
    一个面向本科生、研究生和早期科研人员的AI平台协作技能 (Skill),将论文写作从一次性聊天升级成可追踪、可恢复、可复用的工程化流程。它旨在帮助用户少走弯路,减少返工,把时间花在真正有价值的研究内容上。
  • mediumcomparison#3
    Add a dedicated section to the README outlining core differentiators

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section, e.g., '核心优势与对比 (Core Advantages & Comparison)', with content like: '本 Skill 与传统AI写作工具或学术编辑器的主要区别在于其工程化的协作流程和对多平台(如Claude Code, Gemini CLI)的集成支持。它不只是润色句子,而是提供从选题到投稿的结构化、可追踪的写作系统,强调流程、记录和回写,不依赖单轮记忆,产物为便于版本管理的`.md`或`.tex`文件,而非一次性Word文档。'

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface Norman-bury/research-writing-skill
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
ChatGPT
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. ChatGPT · recommended 1×
  2. Elicit · recommended 1×
  3. Scite.ai · recommended 1×
  4. Semantic Scholar · recommended 1×
  5. QuillBot · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to streamline academic paper writing with AI, including brainstorming and structured content generation?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. ChatGPT
    2. Elicit
    3. Scite.ai
    4. Semantic Scholar
    5. QuillBot
    6. Jasper
    7. Paperpal

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named Norman-bury/research-writing-skill. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Tool for scientific paper drafting, offering LaTeX support, plot generation, and literature review integration?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Overleaf
    2. Authorea
    3. Fidus Writer
    4. Jupyter Notebook
    5. Matplotlib
    6. Seaborn
    7. Plotly
    8. bibtexparser
    9. pandoc-citeproc
    10. nbconvert
    11. R Markdown
    12. RStudio
    13. ggplot2
    14. citr

    AI recommended 14 alternatives but never named Norman-bury/research-writing-skill. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of Norman-bury/research-writing-skill?
    pass
    AI did not name Norman-bury/research-writing-skill — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts Norman-bury/research-writing-skill in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named Norman-bury/research-writing-skill explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo Norman-bury/research-writing-skill solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name Norman-bury/research-writing-skill — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of Norman-bury/research-writing-skill. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/Norman-bury/research-writing-skill.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/Norman-bury/research-writing-skill)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/Norman-bury/research-writing-skill"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/Norman-bury/research-writing-skill.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

Norman-bury/research-writing-skill — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite