RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

Norman-bury/research-writing-skill

Default branch main · commit 5cb13adc · scanned 5/10/2026, 11:17:43 PM

GitHub: 1,347 stars · 102 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
22 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface Norman-bury/research-writing-skill, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening to explicitly state it's an AI Skill/Plugin

    Why:

    CURRENT
    把"论文写作"从一次性聊天，升级成可追踪、可恢复、可复用的工程化协作流程。
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    一个面向Claude Code, Cursor, Gemini CLI等AI平台的科研写作Skill/插件，将论文写作从一次性聊天升级成可追踪、可恢复、可复用的工程化协作流程。
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-assistant, research-writing, academic-writing, large-language-models, llm-plugin, claude-code, cursor, gemini-cli, latex, academic-paper
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://your-documentation-or-demo-site.com (Replace with actual URL for a demo, documentation, or project website.)

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface Norman-bury/research-writing-skill
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
ChatGPT / GPT-4
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. ChatGPT / GPT-4 · recommended 1×
  2. Elicit · recommended 1×
  3. QuillBot · recommended 1×
  4. Grammarly · recommended 1×
  5. Scite.ai · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I manage my academic paper writing process more systematically with AI assistance?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. ChatGPT / GPT-4
    2. Elicit
    3. QuillBot
    4. Grammarly
    5. Scite.ai
    6. Connected Papers
    7. DeepL Write

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named Norman-bury/research-writing-skill. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What AI tools offer structured research paper drafting, LaTeX export, and figure generation?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Authorea
    2. Overleaf
    3. SciSpace
    4. Paperpal
    5. ChatGPT/GPT-4

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named Norman-bury/research-writing-skill. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of Norman-bury/research-writing-skill?
    pass
    AI did not name Norman-bury/research-writing-skill — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts Norman-bury/research-writing-skill in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named Norman-bury/research-writing-skill explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo Norman-bury/research-writing-skill solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name Norman-bury/research-writing-skill — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of Norman-bury/research-writing-skill. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/Norman-bury/research-writing-skill.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/Norman-bury/research-writing-skill)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/Norman-bury/research-writing-skill"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/Norman-bury/research-writing-skill.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

Norman-bury/research-writing-skill — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite